Forums WoW Modding Support Archives TrinityCore Discord Archives [DiscordArchive] overflowing is probably not intended but maybe it is here because of fun <:kekw:707032773831163917>

[DiscordArchive] overflowing is probably not intended but maybe it is here because of fun <:kekw:707032773831163917>

[DiscordArchive] overflowing is probably not intended but maybe it is here because of fun <:kekw:707032773831163917>

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
09-26-2024, 06:27 PM
#1
Archived author: Fabian • Posted: 2024-09-26T18:27:23.982000+00:00
Original source

overflowing is probably not intended but maybe it is here because of fun <:kekw:707032773831163917>
I ahve no idea if the client uses the next field directly for that db2. If it does it most likely has code to handle such things?
rektbyfaith
09-26-2024, 06:27 PM #1

Archived author: Fabian • Posted: 2024-09-26T18:27:23.982000+00:00
Original source

overflowing is probably not intended but maybe it is here because of fun <:kekw:707032773831163917>
I ahve no idea if the client uses the next field directly for that db2. If it does it most likely has code to handle such things?

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
09-26-2024, 06:27 PM
#2
Archived author: Tea • Posted: 2024-09-26T18:27:40.698000+00:00
Original source

it doesnt use it
rektbyfaith
09-26-2024, 06:27 PM #2

Archived author: Tea • Posted: 2024-09-26T18:27:40.698000+00:00
Original source

it doesnt use it

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
09-26-2024, 06:28 PM
#3
Archived author: Hayden • Posted: 2024-09-26T18:28:38.872000+00:00
Original source

What you suggest before they fix this shit? x)
rektbyfaith
09-26-2024, 06:28 PM #3

Archived author: Hayden • Posted: 2024-09-26T18:28:38.872000+00:00
Original source

What you suggest before they fix this shit? x)

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
09-26-2024, 06:29 PM
#4
Archived author: Fabian • Posted: 2024-09-26T18:29:17.651000+00:00
Original source

thats 1102 vs 1105
[Image: image.png?ex=690c403d&is=690aeebd&hm=8a0...0dae7dddc&]

[Image: image.png?ex=690c403d&is=690aeebd&hm=77d...f6078eacf&]
rektbyfaith
09-26-2024, 06:29 PM #4

Archived author: Fabian • Posted: 2024-09-26T18:29:17.651000+00:00
Original source

thats 1102 vs 1105
[Image: image.png?ex=690c403d&is=690aeebd&hm=8a0...0dae7dddc&]

[Image: image.png?ex=690c403d&is=690aeebd&hm=77d...f6078eacf&]

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
09-26-2024, 06:29 PM
#5
Archived author: Fabian • Posted: 2024-09-26T18:29:51.338000+00:00
Original source

well. you either treat is as uint8 as hack or as int16 to follow the 'signed' field
rektbyfaith
09-26-2024, 06:29 PM #5

Archived author: Fabian • Posted: 2024-09-26T18:29:51.338000+00:00
Original source

well. you either treat is as uint8 as hack or as int16 to follow the 'signed' field

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
09-26-2024, 06:30 PM
#6
Archived author: Hayden • Posted: 2024-09-26T18:30:03.247000+00:00
Original source

Rip
rektbyfaith
09-26-2024, 06:30 PM #6

Archived author: Hayden • Posted: 2024-09-26T18:30:03.247000+00:00
Original source

Rip

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
09-26-2024, 06:30 PM
#7
Archived author: Hayden • Posted: 2024-09-26T18:30:52.129000+00:00
Original source

Ok thanks gonna be back to uint8 i think
rektbyfaith
09-26-2024, 06:30 PM #7

Archived author: Hayden • Posted: 2024-09-26T18:30:52.129000+00:00
Original source

Ok thanks gonna be back to uint8 i think

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
09-26-2024, 06:34 PM
#8
Archived author: Fabian • Posted: 2024-09-26T18:34:17.238000+00:00
Original source

feels like there needs to be a force parameter or so to allow getting around the db2 meta checks vs DB2FieldMeta for single fields <:lul:451485508380655616>
rektbyfaith
09-26-2024, 06:34 PM #8

Archived author: Fabian • Posted: 2024-09-26T18:34:17.238000+00:00
Original source

feels like there needs to be a force parameter or so to allow getting around the db2 meta checks vs DB2FieldMeta for single fields <:lul:451485508380655616>

Recently Browsing
 1 Guest(s)
Recently Browsing
 1 Guest(s)