[DiscordArchive] overflowing is probably not intended but maybe it is here because of fun <:kekw:707032773831163917>
[DiscordArchive] overflowing is probably not intended but maybe it is here because of fun <:kekw:707032773831163917>
Archived author: Fabian • Posted: 2024-09-26T18:27:23.982000+00:00
Original source
overflowing is probably not intended but maybe it is here because of fun <:kekw:707032773831163917>
I ahve no idea if the client uses the next field directly for that db2. If it does it most likely has code to handle such things?
Archived author: Tea • Posted: 2024-09-26T18:27:40.698000+00:00
Original source
it doesnt use it
Archived author: Hayden • Posted: 2024-09-26T18:28:38.872000+00:00
Original source
What you suggest before they fix this shit? x)
![[Image: image.png?ex=690c403d&is=690aeebd&hm=8a0...0dae7dddc&]](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/376457124726702080/1288930412734971995/image.png?ex=690c403d&is=690aeebd&hm=8a0f6d486518b08210c4e880673fa1bedfb452b080ee675991a7f260dae7dddc&)
![[Image: image.png?ex=690c403d&is=690aeebd&hm=77d...f6078eacf&]](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/376457124726702080/1288930412986503281/image.png?ex=690c403d&is=690aeebd&hm=77d35d1309736c321e049a00f919bb30ee705140876eb4d0a6dcda1f6078eacf&)
Archived author: Fabian • Posted: 2024-09-26T18:29:17.651000+00:00
Original source
thats 1102 vs 1105
![[Image: image.png?ex=690c403d&is=690aeebd&hm=8a0...0dae7dddc&]](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/376457124726702080/1288930412734971995/image.png?ex=690c403d&is=690aeebd&hm=8a0f6d486518b08210c4e880673fa1bedfb452b080ee675991a7f260dae7dddc&)
![[Image: image.png?ex=690c403d&is=690aeebd&hm=77d...f6078eacf&]](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/376457124726702080/1288930412986503281/image.png?ex=690c403d&is=690aeebd&hm=77d35d1309736c321e049a00f919bb30ee705140876eb4d0a6dcda1f6078eacf&)
Archived author: Fabian • Posted: 2024-09-26T18:29:51.338000+00:00
Original source
well. you either treat is as uint8 as hack or as int16 to follow the 'signed' field
Archived author: Hayden • Posted: 2024-09-26T18:30:03.247000+00:00
Original source
Rip
Archived author: Hayden • Posted: 2024-09-26T18:30:52.129000+00:00
Original source
Ok thanks gonna be back to uint8 i think
Archived author: Fabian • Posted: 2024-09-26T18:34:17.238000+00:00
Original source
feels like there needs to be a force parameter or so to allow getting around the db2 meta checks vs DB2FieldMeta for single fields <:lul:451485508380655616>