Forums WoW Modding Support Archives Azerothcore Discord Archives [DiscordArchive] should i try docker-command version?

[DiscordArchive] should i try docker-command version?

[DiscordArchive] should i try docker-command version?

Pages (4): Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
10-26-2023, 02:03 PM
#21
Archived author: mynameismeat • Posted: 2023-10-26T14:03:04.884000+00:00
Original source

ok, interesting
rektbyfaith
10-26-2023, 02:03 PM #21

Archived author: mynameismeat • Posted: 2023-10-26T14:03:04.884000+00:00
Original source

ok, interesting

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
10-26-2023, 02:03 PM
#22
Archived author: Neverborn • Posted: 2023-10-26T14:03:16.662000+00:00
Original source


[Image: image.png?ex=690c01e4&is=690ab064&hm=fd5...503aed19f&]
rektbyfaith
10-26-2023, 02:03 PM #22

Archived author: Neverborn • Posted: 2023-10-26T14:03:16.662000+00:00
Original source


[Image: image.png?ex=690c01e4&is=690ab064&hm=fd5...503aed19f&]

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
10-26-2023, 02:03 PM
#23
Archived author: mynameismeat • Posted: 2023-10-26T14:03:35.107000+00:00
Original source

first thing that you can do for sure is install the latest docker compose. version 2+ is a hard requirement

https://docs.docker.com/compose/install/...n-manually
rektbyfaith
10-26-2023, 02:03 PM #23

Archived author: mynameismeat • Posted: 2023-10-26T14:03:35.107000+00:00
Original source

first thing that you can do for sure is install the latest docker compose. version 2+ is a hard requirement

https://docs.docker.com/compose/install/...n-manually

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
10-26-2023, 02:04 PM
#24
Archived author: mynameismeat • Posted: 2023-10-26T14:04:04.069000+00:00
Original source

As long as the synology is x86_64 it should have no problems (barring glibc, then we're hosed), thanks Golang
rektbyfaith
10-26-2023, 02:04 PM #24

Archived author: mynameismeat • Posted: 2023-10-26T14:04:04.069000+00:00
Original source

As long as the synology is x86_64 it should have no problems (barring glibc, then we're hosed), thanks Golang

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
10-26-2023, 02:08 PM
#25
Archived author: Neverborn • Posted: 2023-10-26T14:08:38.569000+00:00
Original source

OK. As an alternative solution, i have gotten around sysnolgy / docker issues in the past by creating a generic linux docker container, and then installing apps and services inside the container as if it was a stand alone linux box. There may be a little extra overhead this way, but it would be able to run all packages at newest versions and bypass the softwar elimits of the synology. What do you think of this approach?
rektbyfaith
10-26-2023, 02:08 PM #25

Archived author: Neverborn • Posted: 2023-10-26T14:08:38.569000+00:00
Original source

OK. As an alternative solution, i have gotten around sysnolgy / docker issues in the past by creating a generic linux docker container, and then installing apps and services inside the container as if it was a stand alone linux box. There may be a little extra overhead this way, but it would be able to run all packages at newest versions and bypass the softwar elimits of the synology. What do you think of this approach?

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
10-26-2023, 02:09 PM
#26
Archived author: mynameismeat • Posted: 2023-10-26T14:09:19.109000+00:00
Original source

yeah, that's perfectly fine and doable. you can basically do a "classic install", just inside of a docker container.
rektbyfaith
10-26-2023, 02:09 PM #26

Archived author: mynameismeat • Posted: 2023-10-26T14:09:19.109000+00:00
Original source

yeah, that's perfectly fine and doable. you can basically do a "classic install", just inside of a docker container.

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
10-26-2023, 02:10 PM
#27
Archived author: mynameismeat • Posted: 2023-10-26T14:10:12.751000+00:00
Original source

big things to be aware of, of course is that some things may not be saved, but thats happens
rektbyfaith
10-26-2023, 02:10 PM #27

Archived author: mynameismeat • Posted: 2023-10-26T14:10:12.751000+00:00
Original source

big things to be aware of, of course is that some things may not be saved, but thats happens

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
10-26-2023, 02:11 PM
#28
Archived author: Neverborn • Posted: 2023-10-26T14:11:08.661000+00:00
Original source

If i did it this way, i wouldnt want important parts of the wow server saved inside the container, i would need to map local folders so that data is saved to the NAS.
rektbyfaith
10-26-2023, 02:11 PM #28

Archived author: Neverborn • Posted: 2023-10-26T14:11:08.661000+00:00
Original source

If i did it this way, i wouldnt want important parts of the wow server saved inside the container, i would need to map local folders so that data is saved to the NAS.

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
10-26-2023, 02:11 PM
#29
Archived author: Neverborn • Posted: 2023-10-26T14:11:40.222000+00:00
Original source

WHat folders should be maped to NAS storage so that it can "remember" everything between boots?
rektbyfaith
10-26-2023, 02:11 PM #29

Archived author: Neverborn • Posted: 2023-10-26T14:11:40.222000+00:00
Original source

WHat folders should be maped to NAS storage so that it can "remember" everything between boots?

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
10-26-2023, 02:13 PM
#30
Archived author: mynameismeat • Posted: 2023-10-26T14:13:22.371000+00:00
Original source

yeah. On a super high level, the most important stuff is going to be your custom stuff.

`data/sql/custom`
`env/dist`
`modules`

I personally would run the database as a separate container as well, but that's up to you, of course
rektbyfaith
10-26-2023, 02:13 PM #30

Archived author: mynameismeat • Posted: 2023-10-26T14:13:22.371000+00:00
Original source

yeah. On a super high level, the most important stuff is going to be your custom stuff.

`data/sql/custom`
`env/dist`
`modules`

I personally would run the database as a separate container as well, but that's up to you, of course

Pages (4): Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Recently Browsing
 1 Guest(s)
Recently Browsing
 1 Guest(s)