[DiscordArchive] since u are using TC system where did u source knowledge on how to use it ?
[DiscordArchive] since u are using TC system where did u source knowledge on how to use it ?
Archived author: Rymercyble • Posted: 2024-04-17T18:02:44.040000+00:00
Original source
since u are using TC system where did u source knowledge on how to use it ?
Archived author: ttopper • Posted: 2024-04-17T18:07:53.440000+00:00
Original source
i am porting/massaging the 1.12 spells into a wrath emulator so that I can use the wrath client to play classic
Archived author: ttopper • Posted: 2024-04-17T18:08:14.374000+00:00
Original source
so i have custom "spells" in a sense, they are old spells that got reverted or changed
Archived author: ttopper • Posted: 2024-04-17T18:08:24.996000+00:00
Original source
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ln-8eKzjsNY
[Embed: legionnaire-arena3]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ln-8eKzjsNY
Archived author: ttopper • Posted: 2024-04-17T18:08:43.100000+00:00
Original source
right now it's in TC, but i appreciate the modularity and extra features of AC
Archived author: ttopper • Posted: 2024-04-17T18:09:54.815000+00:00
Original source
weirdly enough, AC uses the same spell_proc_event structure that cmangos uses. I tried just inserting the stuff from that table, but lots of things are still broken. Improved wing clip procs off my bow, even though the spellmasks are correct
Archived author: ttopper • Posted: 2024-04-17T18:10:14.200000+00:00
Original source
i think the way spell ranks are handled between AC and cmangos are different
Archived author: Rymercyble • Posted: 2024-04-17T18:11:54.859000+00:00
Original source
as long as u are not using many of original wotlk spells i would just go with that branch
Archived author: ttopper • Posted: 2024-04-17T18:12:55.430000+00:00
Original source
i've already made a lot of changes to the existing core trying to port all this over. Do you know what files are relevant? I"ll have to manually merge this
Archived author: Rymercyble • Posted: 2024-04-17T18:13:13.346000+00:00
Original source
i got it in my branch there are no obvious issues aside from breaking all procs that worked previously <:kek:1065379143887372398>