[DiscordArchive] i have a question does azeroth core support df (v10.0.2 ) client files ?
[DiscordArchive] i have a question does azeroth core support df (v10.0.2 ) client files ?
Original source
But thats tc related
rektbyfaith
11-03-2022, 04:50 PM #11Archived author: M'Dic • Posted: 2022-11-03T16:50:38.558000+00:00
Original source
But thats tc related
Original source
Az-core current plans are sticking with 335
rektbyfaith
11-03-2022, 04:50 PM #12Archived author: M'Dic • Posted: 2022-11-03T16:50:50.293000+00:00
Original source
Az-core current plans are sticking with 335
Original source
Unless the way to run the classic wotlk client is by patching the exe and dll and simply running the exe, they can keep it - using a launcher just feels so ghetto to me. I would like AC to support the classic client as a separate branch eventually but either way there's no way I'd pick TC over AC.
rektbyfaith
11-03-2022, 05:32 PM #13Archived author: Revision • Posted: 2022-11-03T17:32:46.143000+00:00
Original source
Unless the way to run the classic wotlk client is by patching the exe and dll and simply running the exe, they can keep it - using a launcher just feels so ghetto to me. I would like AC to support the classic client as a separate branch eventually but either way there's no way I'd pick TC over AC.
Original source
I think they were asking about the latest retail client
rektbyfaith
11-03-2022, 05:33 PM #14Archived author: Honey • Posted: 2022-11-03T17:33:34.167000+00:00
Original source
I think they were asking about the latest retail client
Original source
I see. I don't follow the version numbers, there's too many for me to keep track. My bad.
rektbyfaith
11-03-2022, 05:34 PM #15Archived author: Revision • Posted: 2022-11-03T17:34:03.875000+00:00
Original source
I see. I don't follow the version numbers, there's too many for me to keep track. My bad.
Original source
I guess this isn't obvious enough in that case. (sarcasm)
![[Image: unknown.png?ex=690c3376&is=690ae1f6&hm=0...cc88da6b4&]](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/284406375495368704/1037781903043989514/unknown.png?ex=690c3376&is=690ae1f6&hm=02ac71d2acbc9615b68b065e654d85c702764d2fcc2cf63bc8a9be5cc88da6b4&)
rektbyfaith
11-03-2022, 05:34 PM #16Archived author: Revision • Posted: 2022-11-03T17:34:46.823000+00:00
Original source
I guess this isn't obvious enough in that case. (sarcasm)
Original source
People don't read readmes anymore
rektbyfaith
11-03-2022, 05:38 PM #17Archived author: Bench • Posted: 2022-11-03T17:38:23.641000+00:00
Original source
People don't read readmes anymore
Original source
believe me, you are not the only one. just the amount of rework to the client is a huge undertaking for it to work without the aid of a launcher that modifies the temp files and appdata files on the fly.
rektbyfaith
11-03-2022, 05:44 PM #18Archived author: M'Dic • Posted: 2022-11-03T17:44:37.779000+00:00
Original source
believe me, you are not the only one. just the amount of rework to the client is a huge undertaking for it to work without the aid of a launcher that modifies the temp files and appdata files on the fly.
Original source
i think the last time we did something like that was with legion some years back.
rektbyfaith
11-03-2022, 05:45 PM #19Archived author: M'Dic • Posted: 2022-11-03T17:45:03.670000+00:00
Original source
i think the last time we did something like that was with legion some years back.
Original source
amd with wotlk classic still technically evolving\updating, it would make zero sense to attempt anything on a inprogress expansion
rektbyfaith
11-03-2022, 05:45 PM #20Archived author: M'Dic • Posted: 2022-11-03T17:45:48.329000+00:00
Original source
amd with wotlk classic still technically evolving\updating, it would make zero sense to attempt anything on a inprogress expansion