[DiscordArchive] do we have an official codestyle guideline for table column name formatting?
[DiscordArchive] do we have an official codestyle guideline for table column name formatting?
Original source
do we have an official codestyle guideline for table column name formatting?
rektbyfaith
02-04-2025, 05:01 AM #1Archived author: Takenbacon • Posted: 2025-02-04T05:01:24.483000+00:00
Original source
do we have an official codestyle guideline for table column name formatting?
Original source
I believe so
rektbyfaith
02-04-2025, 05:10 AM #2Archived author: Kitzunu • Posted: 2025-02-04T05:10:09.193000+00:00
Original source
I believe so
Original source
Check wiki > SOP > SQL standards
rektbyfaith
02-04-2025, 05:10 AM #3Archived author: Kitzunu • Posted: 2025-02-04T05:10:31.404000+00:00
Original source
Check wiki > SOP > SQL standards
Original source
gotcha
rektbyfaith
02-04-2025, 05:13 AM #4Archived author: Takenbacon • Posted: 2025-02-04T05:13:30.278000+00:00
Original source
gotcha
Original source
not that I plan on doing anything about it but worth mentioning: the current unit test setup kind of sucks and looks abandoned. I understand the appeal of unit tests but I feel like the current approach at least to some degree is wrong
for example World has an interface IWorld, now function definitions are doubled and other defines split between the two files leading to more of a pain in the ass in maintainability. It looks to me like it was some ones proof of concept project and they themselves must've realized it was too much effort to expand upon
rektbyfaith
02-04-2025, 06:01 AM #5Archived author: Takenbacon • Posted: 2025-02-04T06:01:47.935000+00:00
Original source
not that I plan on doing anything about it but worth mentioning: the current unit test setup kind of sucks and looks abandoned. I understand the appeal of unit tests but I feel like the current approach at least to some degree is wrong
for example World has an interface IWorld, now function definitions are doubled and other defines split between the two files leading to more of a pain in the ass in maintainability. It looks to me like it was some ones proof of concept project and they themselves must've realized it was too much effort to expand upon
Original source
what I've seen done before that is _way_ less intrusive is just create optional unit test scripts that'll execute at run time on the actual server rather than trying to create all these mock classes that is bloating the code
rektbyfaith
02-04-2025, 06:05 AM #6Archived author: Takenbacon • Posted: 2025-02-04T06:05:29.940000+00:00
Original source
what I've seen done before that is _way_ less intrusive is just create optional unit test scripts that'll execute at run time on the actual server rather than trying to create all these mock classes that is bloating the code
Original source
I would say thorough unit tests are a wish and much desired, I don’t think that the current state of the implementation has any “protection” status besides it just being there. So there’s options for change
rektbyfaith
02-04-2025, 06:08 AM #7Archived author: sudlud • Posted: 2025-02-04T06:08:11.240000+00:00
Original source
I would say thorough unit tests are a wish and much desired, I don’t think that the current state of the implementation has any “protection” status besides it just being there. So there’s options for change
Original source
Also I have no clue of unit tests btw
rektbyfaith
02-04-2025, 06:08 AM #8Archived author: sudlud • Posted: 2025-02-04T06:08:22.604000+00:00
Original source
Also I have no clue of unit tests btw
Original source
I have nothing against unit tests - I just don't agree with trying to create a mock interfaced version of every class that is going to significantly increase development time (if it were actually used, which it's not)
rektbyfaith
02-04-2025, 06:09 AM #9Archived author: Takenbacon • Posted: 2025-02-04T06:09:13.021000+00:00
Original source
I have nothing against unit tests - I just don't agree with trying to create a mock interfaced version of every class that is going to significantly increase development time (if it were actually used, which it's not)
Original source
Makes sense, no one is going to maintain that
rektbyfaith
02-04-2025, 06:13 AM #10Archived author: sudlud • Posted: 2025-02-04T06:13:51.374000+00:00
Original source
Makes sense, no one is going to maintain that
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)