[DiscordArchive] wasn't CoD disgustingly p2p though?
[DiscordArchive] wasn't CoD disgustingly p2p though?
Original source
so everything "works" in theory, but it just doesnt
rektbyfaith
07-28-2024, 08:01 PM #31Archived author: Widget • Posted: 2024-07-28T20:01:18.368000+00:00
Original source
so everything "works" in theory, but it just doesnt
Original source
every data, scripts and gameplay mechanics need to be reverted
rektbyfaith
07-28-2024, 08:01 PM #32Archived author: Titi • Posted: 2024-07-28T20:01:28.278000+00:00
Original source
every data, scripts and gameplay mechanics need to be reverted
Original source
yep
rektbyfaith
07-28-2024, 08:01 PM #33Archived author: Widget • Posted: 2024-07-28T20:01:32.550000+00:00
Original source
yep
Original source
>assuming it'll ever be done when they jumped to cata classic
<a:OMEGAROLL:915733901417250836>
rektbyfaith
07-28-2024, 08:01 PM #34Archived author: Aleist3r • Posted: 2024-07-28T20:01:45.798000+00:00
Original source
>assuming it'll ever be done when they jumped to cata classic
<a:OMEGAROLL:915733901417250836>
Original source
cata classic is still good for TC cores tbh
rektbyfaith
07-28-2024, 08:02 PM #35Archived author: Widget • Posted: 2024-07-28T20:02:15.911000+00:00
Original source
cata classic is still good for TC cores tbh
Original source
I'm still not convinced TC master is a better starting point than TC 3.3.5 and stitching retail networking to it.
Sure, it's much faster to get it "connectable" from tc master, but imo more effort long term to revert mechanics and everything else
rektbyfaith
07-28-2024, 08:02 PM #36Archived author: Titi • Posted: 2024-07-28T20:02:25.585000+00:00
Original source
I'm still not convinced TC master is a better starting point than TC 3.3.5 and stitching retail networking to it.
Sure, it's much faster to get it "connectable" from tc master, but imo more effort long term to revert mechanics and everything else
Original source
100% agreed
rektbyfaith
07-28-2024, 08:02 PM #37Archived author: Widget • Posted: 2024-07-28T20:02:42.461000+00:00
Original source
100% agreed
Original source
there was that dude that used that branch to try to support 1.14/1.15 clients, but that was really dumb imo
rektbyfaith
07-28-2024, 08:03 PM #38Archived author: Widget • Posted: 2024-07-28T20:03:03.715000+00:00
Original source
there was that dude that used that branch to try to support 1.14/1.15 clients, but that was really dumb imo
Original source
https://github.com/Frostshake/TrinityCor...la_classic
rektbyfaith
07-28-2024, 08:03 PM #39Archived author: Widget • Posted: 2024-07-28T20:03:44.105000+00:00
Original source
https://github.com/Frostshake/TrinityCor...la_classic
Original source
yeah from what I've seen they already abandonned the wrath classic branch for cata classic, and they'll probably abandon that too for MOP classic. it's having the same fate as the master branch of always chasing the latest thing <:kekw:1115251543751532674>
rektbyfaith
07-28-2024, 08:03 PM #40Archived author: Titi • Posted: 2024-07-28T20:03:55.905000+00:00
Original source
yeah from what I've seen they already abandonned the wrath classic branch for cata classic, and they'll probably abandon that too for MOP classic. it's having the same fate as the master branch of always chasing the latest thing <:kekw:1115251543751532674>