[DiscordArchive] the GUID should be stored as a 8 byte value pointed to by local_c.
[DiscordArchive] the GUID should be stored as a 8 byte value pointed to by local_c.
Original source
the GUID should be stored as a 8 byte value pointed to by local_c.
lua_pushnumber wants an 8 byte value (double) as 2nd input param.
but i think since the GUID is alphanumerical, you will have problems just casting it around to a double etc (at least the data won't make that much sense when you look at it).
what exactly do you want to achieve, which you can't use UnitGUID for?
![[Image: image.png?ex=690c66c4&is=690b1544&hm=e01...f4b6a81de&]](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1086807686571642900/1201273916732211340/image.png?ex=690c66c4&is=690b1544&hm=e0132b8aa46c03894a2d21f65291ad4c20bcce7485538286e923275f4b6a81de&)
rektbyfaith
01-28-2024, 09:13 PM #1Archived author: 4bhorrent • Posted: 2024-01-28T21:13:40.406000+00:00
Original source
the GUID should be stored as a 8 byte value pointed to by local_c.
lua_pushnumber wants an 8 byte value (double) as 2nd input param.
but i think since the GUID is alphanumerical, you will have problems just casting it around to a double etc (at least the data won't make that much sense when you look at it).
what exactly do you want to achieve, which you can't use UnitGUID for?
Original source
Forgot to mention I'm on 1.12.1, before the UnitGUID lua function was added
rektbyfaith
01-28-2024, 09:15 PM #2Archived author: balake • Posted: 2024-01-28T21:15:05.690000+00:00
Original source
Forgot to mention I'm on 1.12.1, before the UnitGUID lua function was added
Original source
oops XD
rektbyfaith
01-28-2024, 09:15 PM #3Archived author: 4bhorrent • Posted: 2024-01-28T21:15:13.957000+00:00
Original source
oops XD
Original source
It would be huge for server emulation if the functions frm future expansions could be retroported to 1.12.1
rektbyfaith
01-28-2024, 09:15 PM #4Archived author: balake • Posted: 2024-01-28T21:15:57.585000+00:00
Original source
It would be huge for server emulation if the functions frm future expansions could be retroported to 1.12.1
Original source
i don't have a repo for that version unfortunately.
i think the easiest route would be to write code for the functions you miss,
and then register them all at once by hooking the something where the already existing ones get registered.
so you have the ootb ones + your custom ones.
it's not a simple copy paste though i can assure you ^^
rektbyfaith
01-28-2024, 09:19 PM #5Archived author: 4bhorrent • Posted: 2024-01-28T21:19:45.679000+00:00
Original source
i don't have a repo for that version unfortunately.
i think the easiest route would be to write code for the functions you miss,
and then register them all at once by hooking the something where the already existing ones get registered.
so you have the ootb ones + your custom ones.
it's not a simple copy paste though i can assure you ^^
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)