[DiscordArchive] it means you have to do a check if any of the vectors (edges of the cube) intersect any of the plane
[DiscordArchive] it means you have to do a check if any of the vectors (edges of the cube) intersect any of the plane
Original source
it means you have to do a check if any of the vectors (edges of the cube) intersect any of the planes of the other cube's sides, right?
rektbyfaith
07-17-2023, 02:02 PM #1Archived author: 4bhorrent • Posted: 2023-07-17T14:02:49.753000+00:00
Original source
it means you have to do a check if any of the vectors (edges of the cube) intersect any of the planes of the other cube's sides, right?
Original source
oh that's really cool
rektbyfaith
07-17-2023, 02:24 PM #2Archived author: Azarchius • Posted: 2023-07-17T14:24:41.043000+00:00
Original source
oh that's really cool
Original source
I've been meaning to think of a way to generate antiportals--or at least _show_ them in some way and allow adding/editing by hand
rektbyfaith
07-17-2023, 02:25 PM #3Archived author: Azarchius • Posted: 2023-07-17T14:25:12.796000+00:00
Original source
I've been meaning to think of a way to generate antiportals--or at least _show_ them in some way and allow adding/editing by hand
Original source
there are various builds here with tens of thousands of gobjects--sometimes hundreds of thousands. and while throwing most things out of ClntObjMgr helps performance, would be even better with antiportals I'm sure.
rektbyfaith
07-17-2023, 02:25 PM #4Archived author: Azarchius • Posted: 2023-07-17T14:25:47.747000+00:00
Original source
there are various builds here with tens of thousands of gobjects--sometimes hundreds of thousands. and while throwing most things out of ClntObjMgr helps performance, would be even better with antiportals I'm sure.
Original source
irrc there are some pure antiportal wmos, wonder if those would work as gobjects
rektbyfaith
07-17-2023, 02:32 PM #5Archived author: implave • Posted: 2023-07-17T14:32:38.825000+00:00
Original source
irrc there are some pure antiportal wmos, wonder if those would work as gobjects
Original source
yes, there's one that we used as a terrain 'cutter', WMOs with a special antiportal chunk--I had this in mind back in ~2017 before I knew how to reverse wow
rektbyfaith
07-17-2023, 02:34 PM #6Archived author: Azarchius • Posted: 2023-07-17T14:34:14.094000+00:00
Original source
yes, there's one that we used as a terrain 'cutter', WMOs with a special antiportal chunk--I had this in mind back in ~2017 before I knew how to reverse wow
Original source
I never did figure out how the format works for the purposes of defining a portal, however, but these days I can just insert and modify the antiportal at will
rektbyfaith
07-17-2023, 02:34 PM #7Archived author: Azarchius • Posted: 2023-07-17T14:34:35.884000+00:00
Original source
I never did figure out how the format works for the purposes of defining a portal, however, but these days I can just insert and modify the antiportal at will
Original source
https://wowdev.wiki/WMO#MOPL ah I was thinking of this--terrain cutting planes
[Embed: WMO]
https://wowdev.wiki/WMO
rektbyfaith
07-17-2023, 02:36 PM #8Archived author: Azarchius • Posted: 2023-07-17T14:36:28.437000+00:00
Original source
https://wowdev.wiki/WMO#MOPL ah I was thinking of this--terrain cutting planes
[Embed: WMO]
https://wowdev.wiki/WMO
Original source
huh, a group WMO called 'antiportal' acts as a real antiportal. that's really cool
rektbyfaith
07-17-2023, 02:38 PM #9Archived author: Azarchius • Posted: 2023-07-17T14:38:30.302000+00:00
Original source
huh, a group WMO called 'antiportal' acts as a real antiportal. that's really cool
Original source
thought antiportals were only defined from occ.wdt (with WMOs using only portals rather than antiportals)
rektbyfaith
07-17-2023, 02:38 PM #10Archived author: Azarchius • Posted: 2023-07-17T14:38:40.675000+00:00
Original source
thought antiportals were only defined from occ.wdt (with WMOs using only portals rather than antiportals)
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)