[DiscordArchive] some flag debate : For noggit I pulled the areaTable flags definitions from TBC classic, it does des
[DiscordArchive] some flag debate : For noggit I pulled the areaTable flags definitions from TBC classic, it does des
Original source
some flag debate : For noggit I pulled the areaTable flags definitions from TBC classic, it does describe 0x400 as "Force this area when on a Dynamic Transport" but emulators call it "outland" and use it for flying. Do you think this was accurate for 3.3.5 and blizz updated this flag later or did emulators guess it wrong ?
![[Image: image.png?ex=690c33a1&is=690ae221&hm=520...1972898d0&]](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/408013572430626817/1115695475203526748/image.png?ex=690c33a1&is=690ae221&hm=520a71e597890b290b870ef9f3d4aa97ea43f76a065f7668ec766f11972898d0&)
![[Image: image.png?ex=690c33a1&is=690ae221&hm=ce5...64d81a74d&]](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/408013572430626817/1115695475560034304/image.png?ex=690c33a1&is=690ae221&hm=ce5e7ae06cc9dcf9d1d1c4319adf81d64869de3065057bebb114f4f64d81a74d&)
rektbyfaith
06-06-2023, 05:35 PM #1Archived author: Titi • Posted: 2023-06-06T17:35:29.882000+00:00
Original source
some flag debate : For noggit I pulled the areaTable flags definitions from TBC classic, it does describe 0x400 as "Force this area when on a Dynamic Transport" but emulators call it "outland" and use it for flying. Do you think this was accurate for 3.3.5 and blizz updated this flag later or did emulators guess it wrong ?
Original source
anyways I guess I gotta have the description match how TC works
rektbyfaith
06-06-2023, 05:36 PM #2Archived author: Titi • Posted: 2023-06-06T17:36:07.093000+00:00
Original source
anyways I guess I gotta have the description match how TC works
Original source
Well, it could be it was named incorrectly to begin with, but with the overhaul of cata there was a big change with flight in general and that flag might've become redundant and later reused
rektbyfaith
06-06-2023, 05:37 PM #3Archived author: Nix • Posted: 2023-06-06T17:37:34.447000+00:00
Original source
Well, it could be it was named incorrectly to begin with, but with the overhaul of cata there was a big change with flight in general and that flag might've become redundant and later reused
Original source
I would probably scan all relevant files in 335 for the flag and see where it is used, and if it would at all match the classic tbc description
rektbyfaith
06-06-2023, 05:38 PM #4Archived author: Nix • Posted: 2023-06-06T17:38:13.170000+00:00
Original source
I would probably scan all relevant files in 335 for the flag and see where it is used, and if it would at all match the classic tbc description
Original source
Yeah I'll just rename it in noggit to "flying"
rektbyfaith
06-06-2023, 05:44 PM #5Archived author: Titi • Posted: 2023-06-06T17:44:27.319000+00:00
Original source
Yeah I'll just rename it in noggit to "flying"
Original source
It's FLYABLE
rektbyfaith
06-06-2023, 05:54 PM #6Archived author: robinsch • Posted: 2023-06-06T17:54:18.861000+00:00
Original source
It's FLYABLE
Original source
```
bool CGGameUI::IsFlyableArea()
{
AreaTableRec *dbc; // eax
DWORD v1; // eax
bool result; // eax
result = 0;
if ( CGGameUI::m_subzoneID >= g_AreaTableDB.m_minID
&& CGGameUI::m_subzoneID <= g_AreaTableDB.m_maxID
&& (dbc = g_AreaTableDB.Rows[CGGameUI::m_subzoneID - g_AreaTableDB.m_minID]) != 0
|| CGGameUI::m_areaID >= g_AreaTableDB.m_minID
&& CGGameUI::m_areaID <= g_AreaTableDB.m_maxID
&& (dbc = g_AreaTableDB.Rows[CGGameUI::m_areaID - g_AreaTableDB.m_minID]) != 0 )
{
v1 = dbc->m_flags;
if ( (v1 & 0x400) != 0 && (v1 & 0x20000000) == 0 )
return 1;
}
return result;
}
```
rektbyfaith
06-06-2023, 05:55 PM #7Archived author: robinsch • Posted: 2023-06-06T17:55:55.205000+00:00
Original source
```
bool CGGameUI::IsFlyableArea()
{
AreaTableRec *dbc; // eax
DWORD v1; // eax
bool result; // eax
result = 0;
if ( CGGameUI::m_subzoneID >= g_AreaTableDB.m_minID
&& CGGameUI::m_subzoneID <= g_AreaTableDB.m_maxID
&& (dbc = g_AreaTableDB.Rows[CGGameUI::m_subzoneID - g_AreaTableDB.m_minID]) != 0
|| CGGameUI::m_areaID >= g_AreaTableDB.m_minID
&& CGGameUI::m_areaID <= g_AreaTableDB.m_maxID
&& (dbc = g_AreaTableDB.Rows[CGGameUI::m_areaID - g_AreaTableDB.m_minID]) != 0 )
{
v1 = dbc->m_flags;
if ( (v1 & 0x400) != 0 && (v1 & 0x20000000) == 0 )
return 1;
}
return result;
}
```
Original source
from 335
rektbyfaith
06-06-2023, 05:56 PM #8Archived author: robinsch • Posted: 2023-06-06T17:56:00.660000+00:00
Original source
from 335
Original source
Nice ty. Not sure why there's a client check for this maybe it's to not wait server response
rektbyfaith
06-06-2023, 05:57 PM #9Archived author: Titi • Posted: 2023-06-06T17:57:58.021000+00:00
Original source
Nice ty. Not sure why there's a client check for this maybe it's to not wait server response
Original source
Well why should the client spam the server if it knows it cannot fly.
rektbyfaith
06-06-2023, 05:58 PM #10Archived author: robinsch • Posted: 2023-06-06T17:58:24.020000+00:00
Original source
Well why should the client spam the server if it knows it cannot fly.
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)