[DiscordArchive] We don't seem to encounter this issue, I don't know our process off the top of my head. Perhaps <@27
[DiscordArchive] We don't seem to encounter this issue, I don't know our process off the top of my head. Perhaps <@27
Original source
Current implementation which rewrites all adts doesn't really make sense
rektbyfaith
11-09-2022, 07:46 PM #11Archived author: Titi • Posted: 2022-11-09T19:46:46.692000+00:00
Original source
Current implementation which rewrites all adts doesn't really make sense
Original source
Check all used uids in the whole map first, then reassign only those that are duplicates
rektbyfaith
11-09-2022, 07:47 PM #12Archived author: Titi • Posted: 2022-11-09T19:47:48.211000+00:00
Original source
Check all used uids in the whole map first, then reassign only those that are duplicates
Original source
Being able to set a custom lower bounds for uids per map and per developer would help.
rektbyfaith
11-09-2022, 07:48 PM #13Archived author: Deleted User • Posted: 2022-11-09T19:48:45.188000+00:00
Original source
Being able to set a custom lower bounds for uids per map and per developer would help.
Original source
Then we can just assign devs a chunk of 10000 or something. We'd never individually add more than that tbh
rektbyfaith
11-09-2022, 07:49 PM #14Archived author: Deleted User • Posted: 2022-11-09T19:49:02.947000+00:00
Original source
Then we can just assign devs a chunk of 10000 or something. We'd never individually add more than that tbh
Original source
Maybe with a hashmap, but at some point it might also just be faster to assign a new one rather than keeping track of duplicates.
rektbyfaith
11-09-2022, 10:14 PM #15Archived author: Nix • Posted: 2022-11-09T22:14:24.252000+00:00
Original source
Maybe with a hashmap, but at some point it might also just be faster to assign a new one rather than keeping track of duplicates.
Original source
yeah but the result of this is rewritting all the ADTs, I don't think that it is acceptable
rektbyfaith
11-09-2022, 10:15 PM #16Archived author: Titi • Posted: 2022-11-09T22:15:06.170000+00:00
Original source
yeah but the result of this is rewritting all the ADTs, I don't think that it is acceptable
Original source
It really depends on how big your map is, if it is incredibly large, checking if the ID is already in use could be more expensive
rektbyfaith
11-09-2022, 10:15 PM #17Archived author: Nix • Posted: 2022-11-09T22:15:07.490000+00:00
Original source
It really depends on how big your map is, if it is incredibly large, checking if the ID is already in use could be more expensive
Original source
Just make it deterministic I suppose
rektbyfaith
11-09-2022, 10:15 PM #18Archived author: Nix • Posted: 2022-11-09T22:15:39.829000+00:00
Original source
Just make it deterministic I suppose
Original source
Everytime you regen, the same chunks/objects should always get the same IDs, and when you add new objects, they get added to the end of the list meaning regen could still calculate the correct UID, but also check if that is the current UID before saving the ADT again
rektbyfaith
11-09-2022, 10:16 PM #19Archived author: Nix • Posted: 2022-11-09T22:16:28.438000+00:00
Original source
Everytime you regen, the same chunks/objects should always get the same IDs, and when you add new objects, they get added to the end of the list meaning regen could still calculate the correct UID, but also check if that is the current UID before saving the ADT again
Original source
Then the only times you'd have to overwrite is if you remove a lot of objects, or remove an object that was spawned long ago, but at that point you will be paying the cost of wherever that object was till the end, and when adding new stuff, it should be fairly minimal work needed to regen
rektbyfaith
11-09-2022, 10:17 PM #20Archived author: Nix • Posted: 2022-11-09T22:17:22.335000+00:00
Original source
Then the only times you'd have to overwrite is if you remove a lot of objects, or remove an object that was spawned long ago, but at that point you will be paying the cost of wherever that object was till the end, and when adding new stuff, it should be fairly minimal work needed to regen
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)