[DiscordArchive] but it does?
[DiscordArchive] but it does?
Original source
but it does?
rektbyfaith
05-04-2020, 10:40 AM #1Archived author: Skarn • Posted: 2020-05-04T10:40:45.818000+00:00
Original source
but it does?
Original source
it brings extra confusion
rektbyfaith
05-04-2020, 10:40 AM #2Archived author: Skarn • Posted: 2020-05-04T10:40:51.117000+00:00
Original source
it brings extra confusion
Original source
Then change it the fuck back. God.
rektbyfaith
05-04-2020, 10:40 AM #3Archived author: MaxtorCoder • Posted: 2020-05-04T10:40:52.791000+00:00
Original source
Then change it the fuck back. God.
Original source
I will rewrite that part myself later
rektbyfaith
05-04-2020, 10:41 AM #4Archived author: Skarn • Posted: 2020-05-04T10:41:05.045000+00:00
Original source
I will rewrite that part myself later
Original source
I was just helping clearing some stuff up, and clearly that is not appreciated, understood.
rektbyfaith
05-04-2020, 10:41 AM #5Archived author: MaxtorCoder • Posted: 2020-05-04T10:41:17.602000+00:00
Original source
I was just helping clearing some stuff up, and clearly that is not appreciated, understood.
Original source
It is always appreciated, but please do not bring new terminology or struct names if we know the official name
rektbyfaith
05-04-2020, 10:41 AM #6Archived author: Skarn • Posted: 2020-05-04T10:41:44.343000+00:00
Original source
It is always appreciated, but please do not bring new terminology or struct names if we know the official name
Original source
I find both versions equaly confusing
rektbyfaith
05-04-2020, 10:41 AM #7Archived author: A2 • Posted: 2020-05-04T10:41:45.084000+00:00
Original source
I find both versions equaly confusing
Original source
since other pages may still reference old terminology and it won't help at all
rektbyfaith
05-04-2020, 10:42 AM #8Archived author: Skarn • Posted: 2020-05-04T10:42:13.330000+00:00
Original source
since other pages may still reference old terminology and it won't help at all
Original source
> Skarn: <@!160857905879449600> what do you think on this?
If we have official names, we should use them. Changing terms is a generally bad idea, even within one page, as shit goes out of sync a lot. See M2 where we "fixed" names and now there is shitloads of things nobody knows what it refers to anymore. If (official) names are confusing, add a section to explain them. I'm fine with the community deciding on some name changes, if they are executed on all wiki pages.
rektbyfaith
05-04-2020, 10:43 AM #9Archived author: schlumpf • Posted: 2020-05-04T10:43:34.050000+00:00
Original source
> Skarn: <@!160857905879449600> what do you think on this?
If we have official names, we should use them. Changing terms is a generally bad idea, even within one page, as shit goes out of sync a lot. See M2 where we "fixed" names and now there is shitloads of things nobody knows what it refers to anymore. If (official) names are confusing, add a section to explain them. I'm fine with the community deciding on some name changes, if they are executed on all wiki pages.
Original source
exactly my point^
rektbyfaith
05-04-2020, 10:44 AM #10Archived author: Skarn • Posted: 2020-05-04T10:44:13.376000+00:00
Original source
exactly my point^
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)