Forums WoW Modding Support Archives WoWModding Support Archives [DiscordArchive] <@456226577798135808> still here?

[DiscordArchive] <@456226577798135808> still here?

[DiscordArchive] <@456226577798135808> still here?

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
11-07-2018, 09:42 PM
#11
Archived author: Skarn • Posted: 2018-11-07T21:42:55.093000+00:00
Original source

but that sounds like quite some overhead, polling the dict on every ID
rektbyfaith
11-07-2018, 09:42 PM #11

Archived author: Skarn • Posted: 2018-11-07T21:42:55.093000+00:00
Original source

but that sounds like quite some overhead, polling the dict on every ID

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
11-07-2018, 09:43 PM
#12
Archived author: Skarn • Posted: 2018-11-07T21:43:00.507000+00:00
Original source

that's why I am questioning this
rektbyfaith
11-07-2018, 09:43 PM #12

Archived author: Skarn • Posted: 2018-11-07T21:43:00.507000+00:00
Original source

that's why I am questioning this

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
11-07-2018, 09:48 PM
#13
Archived author: Quantam • Posted: 2018-11-07T21:48:09.603000+00:00
Original source

❤ map
rektbyfaith
11-07-2018, 09:48 PM #13

Archived author: Quantam • Posted: 2018-11-07T21:48:09.603000+00:00
Original source

❤ map

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
11-07-2018, 09:48 PM
#14
Archived author: Quantam • Posted: 2018-11-07T21:48:14.234000+00:00
Original source

I molest it every night
rektbyfaith
11-07-2018, 09:48 PM #14

Archived author: Quantam • Posted: 2018-11-07T21:48:14.234000+00:00
Original source

I molest it every night

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
11-07-2018, 09:51 PM
#15
Archived author: Skarn • Posted: 2018-11-07T21:51:19.841000+00:00
Original source

yeah, it seems record size from header should actually be called n_real_records
rektbyfaith
11-07-2018, 09:51 PM #15

Archived author: Skarn • Posted: 2018-11-07T21:51:19.841000+00:00
Original source

yeah, it seems record size from header should actually be called n_real_records

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
11-07-2018, 09:51 PM
#16
Archived author: Skarn • Posted: 2018-11-07T21:51:26.761000+00:00
Original source

the duplicates are irrelevant to this
rektbyfaith
11-07-2018, 09:51 PM #16

Archived author: Skarn • Posted: 2018-11-07T21:51:26.761000+00:00
Original source

the duplicates are irrelevant to this

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
11-07-2018, 09:58 PM
#17
Archived author: Deleted User • Posted: 2018-11-07T21:58:31.519000+00:00
Original source

I think something like that yea
rektbyfaith
11-07-2018, 09:58 PM #17

Archived author: Deleted User • Posted: 2018-11-07T21:58:31.519000+00:00
Original source

I think something like that yea

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
11-07-2018, 09:58 PM
#18
Archived author: Deleted User • Posted: 2018-11-07T21:58:40.335000+00:00
Original source

I use it as copy on write
rektbyfaith
11-07-2018, 09:58 PM #18

Archived author: Deleted User • Posted: 2018-11-07T21:58:40.335000+00:00
Original source

I use it as copy on write

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
11-07-2018, 10:01 PM
#19
Archived author: Deleted User • Posted: 2018-11-07T22:01:09.610000+00:00
Original source

Just copy the pointer for all entries in the copy table and create a new row once you write to it
rektbyfaith
11-07-2018, 10:01 PM #19

Archived author: Deleted User • Posted: 2018-11-07T22:01:09.610000+00:00
Original source

Just copy the pointer for all entries in the copy table and create a new row once you write to it

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
11-07-2018, 10:03 PM
#20
Archived author: Skarn • Posted: 2018-11-07T22:03:58.953000+00:00
Original source

yeah, that is easy to handle
rektbyfaith
11-07-2018, 10:03 PM #20

Archived author: Skarn • Posted: 2018-11-07T22:03:58.953000+00:00
Original source

yeah, that is easy to handle

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
Recently Browsing
 1 Guest(s)
Recently Browsing
 1 Guest(s)