[DiscordArchive] Didnt know spell editor did that, but that sounds like exactly what Id want, thank you! Just to conf
[DiscordArchive] Didnt know spell editor did that, but that sounds like exactly what Id want, thank you! Just to conf
Archived author: Young Toto • Posted: 2024-08-19T16:36:19.743000+00:00
Original source
Didnt know spell editor did that, but that sounds like exactly what Id want, thank you! Just to confirm, basically all Id need to do is put an unused spell visual id as the visual for the spell, and then copy/paste the visual kits that Id want for that new spell visual id?
Archived author: stoneharry • Posted: 2024-08-19T16:39:26.068000+00:00
Original source
Set the spell visual ID to 0, then copy + paste a kit or effect into it
Archived author: stoneharry • Posted: 2024-08-19T16:39:45.222000+00:00
Original source
the copy + paste behaviour is designed to always create a copy
Archived author: stoneharry • Posted: 2024-08-19T16:40:07.219000+00:00
Original source
And if the spell visual ID is 0 (none), there is a special check to duplicate the spell visual data too
Archived author: Young Toto • Posted: 2024-08-19T16:42:19.430000+00:00
Original source
Ah ok, so could I have multiple spells with visual ID set to 0 and customize them separately?
Archived author: stoneharry • Posted: 2024-08-19T16:42:25.329000+00:00
Original source
yes
Archived author: stoneharry • Posted: 2024-08-19T16:43:07.036000+00:00
Original source
Just be careful with the IDs that change. If I remember correctly, copy + pasting a kit into a spell with visual ID 0, will create:
1) A new spell visual
2) A new spell kit
3) But existing effects/attachments will be copied over WITHOUT creating new IDs
So if you want new effects/attachments on the duplicated kit, you need to copy + paste those too
Archived author: stoneharry • Posted: 2024-08-19T16:43:30.512000+00:00
Original source
Delete is effectively _unlink_ on kits and effects, so it's safe to delete from a new ID without effecting older IDs
Archived author: stoneharry • Posted: 2024-08-19T16:43:56.648000+00:00
Original source
Yes, it's not that intuitive. But this is something I wrote in a couple of days mainly for my own use
Archived author: Young Toto • Posted: 2024-08-19T16:44:21.902000+00:00
Original source
Perfect, that should be fine for what Im trying to achieve. Thanks again!