[DiscordArchive] are sanctuaries defined in dbcs? probably areatable?
[DiscordArchive] are sanctuaries defined in dbcs? probably areatable?
Original source
are sanctuaries defined in dbcs? probably areatable?
rektbyfaith
07-18-2022, 07:52 PM #1Archived author: Kazgrim • Posted: 2022-07-18T19:52:31.144000+00:00
Original source
are sanctuaries defined in dbcs? probably areatable?
Original source
if you have an extremely custom server you can also straight up replace the & with a == and manually work with SetPhaseMask yourself, but this breaks all existing phases
rektbyfaith
07-18-2022, 07:52 PM #2Archived author: <o> • Posted: 2022-07-18T19:52:33.530000+00:00
Original source
if you have an extremely custom server you can also straight up replace the & with a == and manually work with SetPhaseMask yourself, but this breaks all existing phases
Original source
Sure
rektbyfaith
07-18-2022, 07:52 PM #3Archived author: whatwere • Posted: 2022-07-18T19:52:33.692000+00:00
Original source
Sure
Original source
It's very custom, part of it is having GObjects that disappear when interacted with as part of a quest while being usable independent of the quest log.
rektbyfaith
07-18-2022, 07:53 PM #4Archived author: whatwere • Posted: 2022-07-18T19:53:08.867000+00:00
Original source
It's very custom, part of it is having GObjects that disappear when interacted with as part of a quest while being usable independent of the quest log.
Original source
by very custom i mean that your entire server is custom, since replacing the existing system breaks all old phases as well. The "proper" way if you want to retain the old system and have a new one is to extend the phasemask with something like a phase id, which is probably what you're looking to do if you want the "std::map" behavior
rektbyfaith
07-18-2022, 07:54 PM #5Archived author: <o> • Posted: 2022-07-18T19:54:36.891000+00:00
Original source
by very custom i mean that your entire server is custom, since replacing the existing system breaks all old phases as well. The "proper" way if you want to retain the old system and have a new one is to extend the phasemask with something like a phase id, which is probably what you're looking to do if you want the "std::map" behavior
Original source
Every quest is planned to get a rework to this system.
rektbyfaith
07-18-2022, 07:55 PM #6Archived author: whatwere • Posted: 2022-07-18T19:55:00.601000+00:00
Original source
Every quest is planned to get a rework to this system.
Original source
And other reworks.
rektbyfaith
07-18-2022, 07:55 PM #7Archived author: whatwere • Posted: 2022-07-18T19:55:12.065000+00:00
Original source
And other reworks.
Original source
then you can just rewrite SetPhaseMask to use == instead of &
rektbyfaith
07-18-2022, 07:55 PM #8Archived author: <o> • Posted: 2022-07-18T19:55:19.507000+00:00
Original source
then you can just rewrite SetPhaseMask to use == instead of &
Original source
it's not a phasemask anymore at that point, but a phase id system where every phase is completely discrete, but you lose the ability to be in multiple phases at the same time
rektbyfaith
07-18-2022, 07:55 PM #9Archived author: <o> • Posted: 2022-07-18T19:55:41.834000+00:00
Original source
it's not a phasemask anymore at that point, but a phase id system where every phase is completely discrete, but you lose the ability to be in multiple phases at the same time
Original source
in tswow we have both, so it's possible to both work with phase masks and ids, but adding that mod takes just a little longer than rewriting that one function
rektbyfaith
07-18-2022, 07:56 PM #10Archived author: <o> • Posted: 2022-07-18T19:56:18.474000+00:00
Original source
in tswow we have both, so it's possible to both work with phase masks and ids, but adding that mod takes just a little longer than rewriting that one function
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)