[DiscordArchive] just the 9.85 lower, yeah?
[DiscordArchive] just the 9.85 lower, yeah?
Original source
i.e. `exp = s1*level + s2*level^2`
rektbyfaith
06-02-2022, 01:17 PM #21Archived author: <o> • Posted: 2022-06-02T13:17:55.648000+00:00
Original source
i.e. `exp = s1*level + s2*level^2`
Original source
higher powers are probably not very interesting
rektbyfaith
06-02-2022, 01:18 PM #22Archived author: <o> • Posted: 2022-06-02T13:18:11.786000+00:00
Original source
higher powers are probably not very interesting
Original source
what is "s" representing there
rektbyfaith
06-02-2022, 01:18 PM #23Archived author: ACHERAX • Posted: 2022-06-02T13:18:38.540000+00:00
Original source
what is "s" representing there
Original source
any scalar you choose
rektbyfaith
06-02-2022, 01:19 PM #24Archived author: <o> • Posted: 2022-06-02T13:19:31.382000+00:00
Original source
any scalar you choose
Original source
that's the number you play around with
rektbyfaith
06-02-2022, 01:19 PM #25Archived author: <o> • Posted: 2022-06-02T13:19:38.954000+00:00
Original source
that's the number you play around with
Original source
Ah gotcha
rektbyfaith
06-02-2022, 01:19 PM #26Archived author: ACHERAX • Posted: 2022-06-02T13:19:53.456000+00:00
Original source
Ah gotcha
Original source
you can also try sx^(level*sy) if you want something that's designed for a very specific range but completely breaks afterwards
rektbyfaith
06-02-2022, 01:20 PM #27Archived author: <o> • Posted: 2022-06-02T13:20:17.115000+00:00
Original source
you can also try sx^(level*sy) if you want something that's designed for a very specific range but completely breaks afterwards
Original source
Hmm...
rektbyfaith
06-02-2022, 01:21 PM #28Archived author: ACHERAX • Posted: 2022-06-02T13:21:43.431000+00:00
Original source
Hmm...
Original source
(and i misspoke of course, the rate of change of a second-degree term is linear)
rektbyfaith
06-02-2022, 01:26 PM #29Archived author: <o> • Posted: 2022-06-02T13:26:29.378000+00:00
Original source
(and i misspoke of course, the rate of change of a second-degree term is linear)
Original source
`(320*LEVEL + 80*(LEVEL*LEVEL))` is a lot closer to what I want at low levels but I'm thinking how can I make this curve up from that at higher levels more
rektbyfaith
06-02-2022, 01:27 PM #30Archived author: ACHERAX • Posted: 2022-06-02T13:27:05.080000+00:00
Original source
`(320*LEVEL + 80*(LEVEL*LEVEL))` is a lot closer to what I want at low levels but I'm thinking how can I make this curve up from that at higher levels more
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)