[DiscordArchive] Let me guess, it should be true?
[DiscordArchive] Let me guess, it should be true?
Archived author: Tea • Posted: 2024-10-29T13:52:31.535000+00:00
Original source
then each fragment gets 1 or 2 bits, depending on the fragment being indirect (CGObject and CActor)
Archived author: Tea • Posted: 2024-10-29T13:53:37.821000+00:00
Original source
worth keeping in mind that fragment array is always sorted (this is required by the algorithm used in function that reads "Full" serialization)
Archived author: MaxtorCoder • Posted: 2024-10-29T13:53:55.806000+00:00
Original source
Yeah okay...
Archived author: MaxtorCoder • Posted: 2024-10-29T13:54:17.038000+00:00
Original source
So basically the changed fragments are set as true then, correct?
Archived author: Tea • Posted: 2024-10-29T13:54:20.728000+00:00
Original source
this makes bits 1 and 2 always belong to CGObject (mask 3)
Archived author: Tea • Posted: 2024-10-29T13:54:43.770000+00:00
Original source
and bit 3 (mask 4) for FVendor_C (since no other updateable fragment exists)
Archived author: MaxtorCoder • Posted: 2024-10-29T13:55:37.494000+00:00
Original source
Yeah okay I think I understand it
![[Image: image.png?ex=690c0036&is=690aaeb6&hm=ba9...8b8252e81&]](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/376457124726702080/1300820463768961098/image.png?ex=690c0036&is=690aaeb6&hm=ba917cccb1b570a34b8a2d5aff438926ad525b85a4ed0edaf154b6c8b8252e81&)
Archived author: MaxtorCoder • Posted: 2024-10-29T13:56:06.688000+00:00
Original source
So that means that following your logic the first bit is CGObject marked as changed and FVendor_C marked as changed
![[Image: image.png?ex=690c0036&is=690aaeb6&hm=ba9...8b8252e81&]](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/376457124726702080/1300820463768961098/image.png?ex=690c0036&is=690aaeb6&hm=ba917cccb1b570a34b8a2d5aff438926ad525b85a4ed0edaf154b6c8b8252e81&)
Archived author: MaxtorCoder • Posted: 2024-10-29T13:56:12.041000+00:00
Original source
Hence bit 1 and 3 being set
Archived author: MaxtorCoder • Posted: 2024-10-29T13:56:18.313000+00:00
Original source
Is that a correct assumption?