[DiscordArchive] Hey, I wanna fool around with the master branch but don't have enough space to install the latest wo
[DiscordArchive] Hey, I wanna fool around with the master branch but don't have enough space to install the latest wo
Original source
Hey, I wanna fool around with the master branch but don't have enough space to install the latest wow client yet so I figured I'd ask before I jump right into deleting stuff - Is it possible to re-enable past expansion features that blizz took away like the heart of azeroth and the cursed equips? Or would I have to use a server that is stuck on those older expansions?
rektbyfaith
08-27-2024, 08:02 PM #1Archived author: SHADOWFIRE • Posted: 2024-08-27T20:02:28.639000+00:00
Original source
Hey, I wanna fool around with the master branch but don't have enough space to install the latest wow client yet so I figured I'd ask before I jump right into deleting stuff - Is it possible to re-enable past expansion features that blizz took away like the heart of azeroth and the cursed equips? Or would I have to use a server that is stuck on those older expansions?
Original source
heart of azeroth still works
rektbyfaith
08-27-2024, 08:06 PM #2Archived author: Tea • Posted: 2024-08-27T20:06:09.537000+00:00
Original source
heart of azeroth still works
Original source
corruptions effects werent implemented in tc so they dont really work
rektbyfaith
08-27-2024, 08:06 PM #3Archived author: Tea • Posted: 2024-08-27T20:06:28.469000+00:00
Original source
corruptions effects werent implemented in tc so they dont really work
Original source
Ah ok ty! But if they do get implemented at somepoint, theyd be allowed to be used? Or would it follow blizzards approach?
rektbyfaith
08-27-2024, 08:08 PM #4Archived author: SHADOWFIRE • Posted: 2024-08-27T20:08:00.486000+00:00
Original source
Ah ok ty! But if they do get implemented at somepoint, theyd be allowed to be used? Or would it follow blizzards approach?
Original source
diff is wrong for sure
rektbyfaith
08-27-2024, 08:08 PM #5Archived author: jackpoz • Posted: 2024-08-27T20:08:34.584000+00:00
Original source
diff is wrong for sure
Original source
it was "less wrong" when world update was capped at 50 ms, now it's 1 ms
rektbyfaith
08-27-2024, 08:09 PM #6Archived author: jackpoz • Posted: 2024-08-27T20:09:14.249000+00:00
Original source
it was "less wrong" when world update was capped at 50 ms, now it's 1 ms
Original source
got it, i appreciate the context
rektbyfaith
08-27-2024, 08:10 PM #7Archived author: Razmataz • Posted: 2024-08-27T20:10:00.266000+00:00
Original source
got it, i appreciate the context
Original source
I go as far as saying that it makes little sense to have ms resolution for that
rektbyfaith
08-27-2024, 08:11 PM #8Archived author: jackpoz • Posted: 2024-08-27T20:11:30.680000+00:00
Original source
I go as far as saying that it makes little sense to have ms resolution for that
Original source
#define MIN_UNLOAD_DELAY 1 // immediate unload
rektbyfaith
08-27-2024, 08:11 PM #9Archived author: jackpoz • Posted: 2024-08-27T20:11:45.597000+00:00
Original source
#define MIN_UNLOAD_DELAY 1 // immediate unload
Original source
the only case is when delaying it only until next world update
rektbyfaith
08-27-2024, 08:12 PM #10Archived author: jackpoz • Posted: 2024-08-27T20:12:11.631000+00:00
Original source
the only case is when delaying it only until next world update
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)