[DiscordArchive] does GetProgress take GetTimeToTargetScale into account?
[DiscordArchive] does GetProgress take GetTimeToTargetScale into account?
Original source
it is then used
rektbyfaith
07-17-2023, 05:40 PM #11Archived author: Telegrill • Posted: 2023-07-17T17:40:54.579000+00:00
Original source
it is then used
Original source
Iirc it didn’t use GetTimeToTargetExtraScald
rektbyfaith
07-17-2023, 05:41 PM #12Archived author: Seyden • Posted: 2023-07-17T17:41:20.632000+00:00
Original source
Iirc it didn’t use GetTimeToTargetExtraScald
Original source
you're not supposed to be using that
rektbyfaith
07-17-2023, 05:41 PM #13Archived author: Telegrill • Posted: 2023-07-17T17:41:31.837000+00:00
Original source
you're not supposed to be using that
Original source
For other stuff
rektbyfaith
07-17-2023, 05:42 PM #14Archived author: Seyden • Posted: 2023-07-17T17:42:05.936000+00:00
Original source
For other stuff
Original source
You need to
rektbyfaith
07-17-2023, 05:42 PM #15Archived author: Seyden • Posted: 2023-07-17T17:42:08.186000+00:00
Original source
You need to
Original source
Or? I can’t remember
rektbyfaith
07-17-2023, 05:42 PM #16Archived author: Seyden • Posted: 2023-07-17T17:42:36.918000+00:00
Original source
Or? I can’t remember
Original source
What was the anduin barrier using
rektbyfaith
07-17-2023, 05:42 PM #17Archived author: Seyden • Posted: 2023-07-17T17:42:42.779000+00:00
Original source
What was the anduin barrier using
Original source
Iirc we weren’t able to use Progress for anduin barrier because it didn’t use the correct
rektbyfaith
07-17-2023, 05:43 PM #18Archived author: Seyden • Posted: 2023-07-17T17:43:52.049000+00:00
Original source
Iirc we weren’t able to use Progress for anduin barrier because it didn’t use the correct
Original source
in order for the AT to be correct at size during progress in Update ticks, you should be sending:
```
if (ScaleCurveId)
{
radius = 0.f + (baseRadius - 0.f) * GetCurveValueAt(CurveScaleId, GetProgress());
innerRadius = 0.f + (innerRadius - 0.f) * GetCurveValueAt(CurveScaleId, GetProgress());
}
```
rektbyfaith
07-17-2023, 05:44 PM #19Archived author: Telegrill • Posted: 2023-07-17T17:44:12.947000+00:00
Original source
in order for the AT to be correct at size during progress in Update ticks, you should be sending:
```
if (ScaleCurveId)
{
radius = 0.f + (baseRadius - 0.f) * GetCurveValueAt(CurveScaleId, GetProgress());
innerRadius = 0.f + (innerRadius - 0.f) * GetCurveValueAt(CurveScaleId, GetProgress());
}
```
Original source
raw calculation in update ticks looks ugly as hell, move it to a new method
rektbyfaith
07-17-2023, 05:45 PM #20Archived author: Telegrill • Posted: 2023-07-17T17:45:14.958000+00:00
Original source
raw calculation in update ticks looks ugly as hell, move it to a new method
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)