[DiscordArchive] <@200677690838220800> what about the statement I linked to above? Outdated?
[DiscordArchive] <@200677690838220800> what about the statement I linked to above? Outdated?
Original source
<@200677690838220800> what about the statement I linked to above? Outdated?
rektbyfaith
06-06-2024, 07:50 AM #1Archived author: chipzz • Posted: 2024-06-06T07:50:18.783000+00:00
Original source
<@200677690838220800> what about the statement I linked to above? Outdated?
Original source
https://discord.com/channels/37607328642...9561485312 funjoker didn't contradict what I was saying
rektbyfaith
06-06-2024, 07:50 AM #2Archived author: chipzz • Posted: 2024-06-06T07:50:57.577000+00:00
Original source
https://discord.com/channels/37607328642...9561485312 funjoker didn't contradict what I was saying
Original source
(But having both channels IS confusing. If Cata Classic development is supposed to happen in here, someone should make <#376457068506382336> read-only)
rektbyfaith
06-06-2024, 07:52 AM #3Archived author: chipzz • Posted: 2024-06-06T07:52:26.507000+00:00
Original source
(But having both channels IS confusing. If Cata Classic development is supposed to happen in here, someone should make <#376457068506382336> read-only)
Original source
<@200677690838220800> the reason I'm saying what I'm saying is because TCPP was (is?) a project with its own set of dedicated devs. What happens if/ when Blizzard release MoP classic? People are going to move on to that, but the TCPP devs will probably keep maintaining Cata Classic...
rektbyfaith
06-06-2024, 07:55 AM #4Archived author: chipzz • Posted: 2024-06-06T07:55:44.239000+00:00
Original source
<@200677690838220800> the reason I'm saying what I'm saying is because TCPP was (is?) a project with its own set of dedicated devs. What happens if/ when Blizzard release MoP classic? People are going to move on to that, but the TCPP devs will probably keep maintaining Cata Classic...
Original source
<@278884041556754432> what's your position on all this? Is your statement I linked to outdated/ no longer correct?
rektbyfaith
06-06-2024, 08:00 AM #5Archived author: chipzz • Posted: 2024-06-06T08:00:11.104000+00:00
Original source
<@278884041556754432> what's your position on all this? Is your statement I linked to outdated/ no longer correct?
Original source
You're overthinking. 434 is for old cata, classic is for all classic versions including 4.4 x
rektbyfaith
06-06-2024, 08:04 AM #6Archived author: Northstrider • Posted: 2024-06-06T08:04:45.652000+00:00
Original source
You're overthinking. 434 is for old cata, classic is for all classic versions including 4.4 x
Original source
Why keep the channel around (or, not read-only, in case you want to keep it for people who want to search it) when TCPP has been abandonned?
rektbyfaith
06-06-2024, 08:19 AM #7Archived author: chipzz • Posted: 2024-06-06T08:19:21.677000+00:00
Original source
Why keep the channel around (or, not read-only, in case you want to keep it for people who want to search it) when TCPP has been abandonned?
Original source
because there apparently still are people that wanna use it. there is no point in locking these channels
rektbyfaith
06-06-2024, 08:38 AM #8Archived author: Northstrider • Posted: 2024-06-06T08:38:29.718000+00:00
Original source
because there apparently still are people that wanna use it. there is no point in locking these channels
Original source
Tbh we are not responsible for DC channels. We could set the 4.3.4 on read only mode
rektbyfaith
06-06-2024, 08:46 AM #9Archived author: funjoker • Posted: 2024-06-06T08:46:58.407000+00:00
Original source
Tbh we are not responsible for DC channels. We could set the 4.3.4 on read only mode
Original source
So people can still check messages
rektbyfaith
06-06-2024, 08:47 AM #10Archived author: funjoker • Posted: 2024-06-06T08:47:06.312000+00:00
Original source
So people can still check messages
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)