[DiscordArchive] Is a generic core addition for 3.3.5a generally compatibile with master? If I want to add the gm com
[DiscordArchive] Is a generic core addition for 3.3.5a generally compatibile with master? If I want to add the gm com
Original source
Is a generic core addition for 3.3.5a generally compatibile with master? If I want to add the gm command from azeroth core ".bags clear" to trinity could it be added to most TC branches?
rektbyfaith
08-08-2025, 06:02 PM #1Archived author: JudgeFae • Posted: 2025-08-08T18:02:55.064000+00:00
Original source
Is a generic core addition for 3.3.5a generally compatibile with master? If I want to add the gm command from azeroth core ".bags clear" to trinity could it be added to most TC branches?
Original source
We accept prs only from the original authors of code changes btw
rektbyfaith
08-08-2025, 06:05 PM #2Archived author: jackpoz • Posted: 2025-08-08T18:05:41.837000+00:00
Original source
We accept prs only from the original authors of code changes btw
Original source
Any port probably won't be 1:1 so I'd be more of a co-author?
rektbyfaith
08-08-2025, 06:06 PM #3Archived author: JudgeFae • Posted: 2025-08-08T18:06:18.193000+00:00
Original source
Any port probably won't be 1:1 so I'd be more of a co-author?
Original source
But will keep that in mind and might find and pester whoever wrote the original
rektbyfaith
08-08-2025, 06:06 PM #4Archived author: JudgeFae • Posted: 2025-08-08T18:06:39.021000+00:00
Original source
But will keep that in mind and might find and pester whoever wrote the original
Original source
Oh absolutely. There are a myriad of reasons why some of the code sucks. So many people have worked on it, and software changes a lot in a few years let alone 20. And open source devs are working on it out of their own passion, it's not a paid job.
The code is not bad for performance
rektbyfaith
08-08-2025, 06:09 PM #5Archived author: stoneharry • Posted: 2025-08-08T18:09:39.394000+00:00
Original source
Oh absolutely. There are a myriad of reasons why some of the code sucks. So many people have worked on it, and software changes a lot in a few years let alone 20. And open source devs are working on it out of their own passion, it's not a paid job.
The code is not bad for performance
Original source
You would have to implement the feature without looking at the code of the fork
rektbyfaith
08-08-2025, 06:09 PM #6Archived author: jackpoz • Posted: 2025-08-08T18:09:57.307000+00:00
Original source
You would have to implement the feature without looking at the code of the fork
Original source
I could do something like that. Can't guartntee it would be exceptionally good
rektbyfaith
08-08-2025, 06:10 PM #7Archived author: JudgeFae • Posted: 2025-08-08T18:10:19.415000+00:00
Original source
I could do something like that. Can't guartntee it would be exceptionally good
Original source
I just like the feature
rektbyfaith
08-08-2025, 06:10 PM #8Archived author: JudgeFae • Posted: 2025-08-08T18:10:26.708000+00:00
Original source
I just like the feature
Original source
But you're right the whole file is encoded with AC copyright
rektbyfaith
08-08-2025, 06:10 PM #9Archived author: JudgeFae • Posted: 2025-08-08T18:10:42.699000+00:00
Original source
But you're right the whole file is encoded with AC copyright
Original source
which would be a good reason for you to try to write a own version
rektbyfaith
08-08-2025, 06:11 PM #10Archived author: Northstrider • Posted: 2025-08-08T18:11:09.901000+00:00
Original source
which would be a good reason for you to try to write a own version
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)