[DiscordArchive] You linked https://choosealicense.com/no-permission/ . Did you read the "For Users" section ?
[DiscordArchive] You linked https://choosealicense.com/no-permission/ . Did you read the "For Users" section ?
Original source
You linked https://choosealicense.com/no-permission/ . Did you read the "For Users" section ?
[Embed: No License]
You’re under no obligation to choose a license and it’s your right not to include one with your code or project. But please note that opting out of open source licenses doesn’t mean you’re opting out of copyright law.
https://choosealicense.com/no-permission/
rektbyfaith
07-28-2024, 08:27 PM #1Archived author: jackpoz • Posted: 2024-07-28T20:27:29.397000+00:00
Original source
You linked https://choosealicense.com/no-permission/ . Did you read the "For Users" section ?
[Embed: No License]
You’re under no obligation to choose a license and it’s your right not to include one with your code or project. But please note that opting out of open source licenses doesn’t mean you’re opting out of copyright law.
https://choosealicense.com/no-permission/
Original source
It's not like TC's license has achieved much, you have AC which blatently disregarded it, many private-source repacks, many private forks doing whatever they like. But it makes sense to maintain some sense of professionalism with such a large and well used code base.
These licenses are more suited for the real world where there is monetary gain to defend a license
rektbyfaith
07-28-2024, 08:27 PM #2Archived author: stoneharry • Posted: 2024-07-28T20:27:43.500000+00:00
Original source
It's not like TC's license has achieved much, you have AC which blatently disregarded it, many private-source repacks, many private forks doing whatever they like. But it makes sense to maintain some sense of professionalism with such a large and well used code base.
These licenses are more suited for the real world where there is monetary gain to defend a license
Original source
"open an issue requesting a license and include a link to this site"
rektbyfaith
07-28-2024, 08:27 PM #3Archived author: jackpoz • Posted: 2024-07-28T20:27:54.226000+00:00
Original source
"open an issue requesting a license and include a link to this site"
Original source
That's what it suggests
rektbyfaith
07-28-2024, 08:28 PM #4Archived author: jackpoz • Posted: 2024-07-28T20:28:02.939000+00:00
Original source
That's what it suggests
Original source
Notice how weak the language is? `You should` `think about`, `generally`
rektbyfaith
07-28-2024, 08:28 PM #5Archived author: stoneharry • Posted: 2024-07-28T20:28:05.457000+00:00
Original source
Notice how weak the language is? `You should` `think about`, `generally`
Original source
AC disregards TC license ?
rektbyfaith
07-28-2024, 08:28 PM #6Archived author: jackpoz • Posted: 2024-07-28T20:28:49.789000+00:00
Original source
AC disregards TC license ?
Original source
Which part ?
rektbyfaith
07-28-2024, 08:28 PM #7Archived author: jackpoz • Posted: 2024-07-28T20:28:55.588000+00:00
Original source
Which part ?
Original source
Private forks are fine by TC license. Only repacks without sourcecode available on request are not.
rektbyfaith
07-28-2024, 08:30 PM #8Archived author: jackpoz • Posted: 2024-07-28T20:30:49.980000+00:00
Original source
Private forks are fine by TC license. Only repacks without sourcecode available on request are not.
Original source
Without digging into old threads, I cannot recall the details
rektbyfaith
07-28-2024, 08:30 PM #9Archived author: stoneharry • Posted: 2024-07-28T20:30:52.624000+00:00
Original source
Without digging into old threads, I cannot recall the details
Original source
There is the relicensing/cherry-picking incorrectly
rektbyfaith
07-28-2024, 08:33 PM #10Archived author: Bench • Posted: 2024-07-28T20:33:08.092000+00:00
Original source
There is the relicensing/cherry-picking incorrectly
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)