[DiscordArchive] And are you sure that compromise won't break next time we implement a core mechanic properly ?
[DiscordArchive] And are you sure that compromise won't break next time we implement a core mechanic properly ?
Original source
Then u got non blizz stuff on there. Like how u can blink when on a flying mount
rektbyfaith
07-01-2024, 01:01 AM #21Archived author: M'Dic • Posted: 2024-07-01T01:01:24.665000+00:00
Original source
Then u got non blizz stuff on there. Like how u can blink when on a flying mount
Original source
Speed handling is jacked and they wrecked the anticheat hard.
rektbyfaith
07-01-2024, 01:01 AM #22Archived author: M'Dic • Posted: 2024-07-01T01:01:45.023000+00:00
Original source
Speed handling is jacked and they wrecked the anticheat hard.
Original source
I didn't say that AC is perfect, TC isn't perfect either... it's still an emulation and not original code from Blizzard. But the fact is that you could take code, test it and then refine and improve it if necessary, but that's not what you want to do. Nobody says that you should copy everything 1:1, but you can look at the source and make small changes to make it more comfortable for TC without having to rewrite it completely.
It's like when you make a draft on the drawing board, it doesn't reflect the final result, but it's a rough approach, that's how you should see it. That's just my personal opinion. Instead of fighting each other, you should work together.
rektbyfaith
07-01-2024, 01:02 AM #23Archived author: Krutok • Posted: 2024-07-01T01:02:08.052000+00:00
Original source
I didn't say that AC is perfect, TC isn't perfect either... it's still an emulation and not original code from Blizzard. But the fact is that you could take code, test it and then refine and improve it if necessary, but that's not what you want to do. Nobody says that you should copy everything 1:1, but you can look at the source and make small changes to make it more comfortable for TC without having to rewrite it completely.
It's like when you make a draft on the drawing board, it doesn't reflect the final result, but it's a rough approach, that's how you should see it. That's just my personal opinion. Instead of fighting each other, you should work together.
Original source
I mean. For the trade off of "more works" seems pretty intense. It just seems like more avoidance for the sake of playthru pserver progression
rektbyfaith
07-01-2024, 01:02 AM #24Archived author: M'Dic • Posted: 2024-07-01T01:02:46.796000+00:00
Original source
I mean. For the trade off of "more works" seems pretty intense. It just seems like more avoidance for the sake of playthru pserver progression
Original source
Not a emulator in a definition term
rektbyfaith
07-01-2024, 01:03 AM #25Archived author: M'Dic • Posted: 2024-07-01T01:03:26.636000+00:00
Original source
Not a emulator in a definition term
Original source
More like client manipulation.
rektbyfaith
07-01-2024, 01:03 AM #26Archived author: M'Dic • Posted: 2024-07-01T01:03:39.974000+00:00
Original source
More like client manipulation.
Original source
But emulator definition does not seem remotely correct here. I just think it was a term used and carried over from arcemu to mangos days
rektbyfaith
07-01-2024, 01:04 AM #27Archived author: M'Dic • Posted: 2024-07-01T01:04:30.413000+00:00
Original source
But emulator definition does not seem remotely correct here. I just think it was a term used and carried over from arcemu to mangos days
Original source
I don't speak for others anyway, I'm just saying my personal opinion and how I see it. I can't force anyone to do anything or act against their interests.
I would just be in favor of more openness and not so obstinateness when it comes to sharing sources. Take a more relaxed approach to the whole thing. And if someone thinks it would be illegal to copy it, then I have to say that just making server software + Blizzard property available, which corresponds to the database, for example, isn't entirely legal either, not to mention operating such a server. It was not for nothing that Nelatirus' server was sued and closed back then. Of course they also traded with real money.
rektbyfaith
07-01-2024, 01:08 AM #28Archived author: Krutok • Posted: 2024-07-01T01:08:03.203000+00:00
Original source
I don't speak for others anyway, I'm just saying my personal opinion and how I see it. I can't force anyone to do anything or act against their interests.
I would just be in favor of more openness and not so obstinateness when it comes to sharing sources. Take a more relaxed approach to the whole thing. And if someone thinks it would be illegal to copy it, then I have to say that just making server software + Blizzard property available, which corresponds to the database, for example, isn't entirely legal either, not to mention operating such a server. It was not for nothing that Nelatirus' server was sued and closed back then. Of course they also traded with real money.
Original source
Well sure but when there are licensing conflicts, that's absolutely a barrier to collaboration
rektbyfaith
07-01-2024, 01:09 AM #29Archived author: Bench • Posted: 2024-07-01T01:09:07.637000+00:00
Original source
Well sure but when there are licensing conflicts, that's absolutely a barrier to collaboration
Original source
It'd be one thing if e.g. CMaNGOS and Trinity were to collaborate since they have the same license, but AC is problematic
rektbyfaith
07-01-2024, 01:09 AM #30Archived author: Bench • Posted: 2024-07-01T01:09:49.965000+00:00
Original source
It'd be one thing if e.g. CMaNGOS and Trinity were to collaborate since they have the same license, but AC is problematic
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)