[DiscordArchive] what do you think ?
[DiscordArchive] what do you think ?
Original source
what do you think ?
rektbyfaith
09-12-2023, 02:11 AM #1Archived author: BlackHatUsr • Posted: 2023-09-12T02:11:50.538000+00:00
Original source
what do you think ?
Original source
WorkingDirectory=*SELF-EXPLAINATORY*
User=root
ExecStart=/usr/bin/screen -dmS worldserver /*Self-Explainatory*-worldserver
ExecReload=/usr/bin/screen -S worldserver -p 0 -X stuff "server shutdown force 0\\r"; /usr/bin/screen -dmS worldserver /*SELF-EXplainatory*-/worldserver
ExecStop=/usr/bin/screen -S worldserver -p 0 -X stuff "server shutdown force 0\\r"
RestartSec=10s
Restart=always
rektbyfaith
09-12-2023, 02:14 AM #2Archived author: BlackHatUsr • Posted: 2023-09-12T02:14:01.627000+00:00
Original source
WorkingDirectory=*SELF-EXPLAINATORY*
User=root
ExecStart=/usr/bin/screen -dmS worldserver /*Self-Explainatory*-worldserver
ExecReload=/usr/bin/screen -S worldserver -p 0 -X stuff "server shutdown force 0\\r"; /usr/bin/screen -dmS worldserver /*SELF-EXplainatory*-/worldserver
ExecStop=/usr/bin/screen -S worldserver -p 0 -X stuff "server shutdown force 0\\r"
RestartSec=10s
Restart=always
Original source
gives a Error saying " Not on Advanced Terminal "
rektbyfaith
09-12-2023, 02:14 AM #3Archived author: BlackHatUsr • Posted: 2023-09-12T02:14:16.708000+00:00
Original source
gives a Error saying " Not on Advanced Terminal "
Original source
ExecStart=/usr/bin/screen -dmS trinauth /home/masterslave/335a/server/bin/authserver
Gives " DEAD " Aswell
It's more useful as screen -dmS name command args - that will start a screen session called name in the background (i.e. detached), and run command args inside that screen session.
Without the command args, it will just start the screen session in the background.
Due to Complexity of Various Systems Everything has a Sys-Link/Sym-Link , like this one :
https://discord.com/channels/37607328642...9275523125
rektbyfaith
09-12-2023, 02:15 AM #4Archived author: BlackHatUsr • Posted: 2023-09-12T02:15:12.604000+00:00
Original source
ExecStart=/usr/bin/screen -dmS trinauth /home/masterslave/335a/server/bin/authserver
Gives " DEAD " Aswell
It's more useful as screen -dmS name command args - that will start a screen session called name in the background (i.e. detached), and run command args inside that screen session.
Without the command args, it will just start the screen session in the background.
Due to Complexity of Various Systems Everything has a Sys-Link/Sym-Link , like this one :
https://discord.com/channels/37607328642...9275523125
Original source
All of This should Warp the " Proccess " in a SCREEN-Command Terminal , Unlike the "integration" where you can Simply
just Call the SYSTEMCTL and Add it to CORE-PROCESS , Unlike Those SCREEN can be Manually On-Hand Resumed by the User and interact with it , While in the SYSTEMCTL Core-Process you cant interact with the " Terminal " inside the Core-Process and lets say cant Type " .account create BlackHat PASS " && Then " .account set gmlevel BlackHat 3 -1 "
rektbyfaith
09-12-2023, 02:21 AM #5Archived author: BlackHatUsr • Posted: 2023-09-12T02:21:13.094000+00:00
Original source
All of This should Warp the " Proccess " in a SCREEN-Command Terminal , Unlike the "integration" where you can Simply
just Call the SYSTEMCTL and Add it to CORE-PROCESS , Unlike Those SCREEN can be Manually On-Hand Resumed by the User and interact with it , While in the SYSTEMCTL Core-Process you cant interact with the " Terminal " inside the Core-Process and lets say cant Type " .account create BlackHat PASS " && Then " .account set gmlevel BlackHat 3 -1 "
Original source
this would let me AVOID RCON ( Remote Control Connections ) To The Terminal Outside the Local 127.0.0.1 and Leaving it EXPOSED to ....
rektbyfaith
09-12-2023, 02:22 AM #6Archived author: BlackHatUsr • Posted: 2023-09-12T02:22:07.548000+00:00
Original source
this would let me AVOID RCON ( Remote Control Connections ) To The Terminal Outside the Local 127.0.0.1 and Leaving it EXPOSED to ....
Original source
Also , When " informing " someone Something you obviously Aware of , You should Warn them , They Need Read+Write Permission on File otherwise System wont Find it As " Positive " on Startup , this is not Windows , including single file wont make it RUN by itself ! im not picky just Saying and Yes i did give it 744 + 664 + 644 ( Depending on Version The user is ! )
rektbyfaith
09-12-2023, 02:28 AM #7Archived author: BlackHatUsr • Posted: 2023-09-12T02:28:42.927000+00:00
Original source
Also , When " informing " someone Something you obviously Aware of , You should Warn them , They Need Read+Write Permission on File otherwise System wont Find it As " Positive " on Startup , this is not Windows , including single file wont make it RUN by itself ! im not picky just Saying and Yes i did give it 744 + 664 + 644 ( Depending on Version The user is ! )
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)