[DiscordArchive] Dealing with Active Mover stuff is a real headache. I think this wasn't in the old 3.3.5 branches...
[DiscordArchive] Dealing with Active Mover stuff is a real headache. I think this wasn't in the old 3.3.5 branches...
Original source
Dealing with Active Mover stuff is a real headache. I think this wasn't in the old 3.3.5 branches... I mean, server sends something like SMSG_CLIENT_CONTROL_UPDATE to the client and then the client essentially acks with CMSG_SET_ACTIVE_MOVER but why does TC wait for the client to send this packet? Does the client not just always ack with what's sent? Is there a case where the client won't send a CMSG_SET_ACTIVE_MOVER with a guid identical to the one sent to it in SMSG_CLIENT_CONTROL_UPDATE? I mean I know it's not really in *direct* response to packets like this but when won't they control the Unit and set it as the mover for the one sent in SMSG_CLIENT_CONTROL_UPDATE?
rektbyfaith
09-23-2022, 03:26 AM #1Archived author: HelloKitty • Posted: 2022-09-23T03:26:53.634000+00:00
Original source
Dealing with Active Mover stuff is a real headache. I think this wasn't in the old 3.3.5 branches... I mean, server sends something like SMSG_CLIENT_CONTROL_UPDATE to the client and then the client essentially acks with CMSG_SET_ACTIVE_MOVER but why does TC wait for the client to send this packet? Does the client not just always ack with what's sent? Is there a case where the client won't send a CMSG_SET_ACTIVE_MOVER with a guid identical to the one sent to it in SMSG_CLIENT_CONTROL_UPDATE? I mean I know it's not really in *direct* response to packets like this but when won't they control the Unit and set it as the mover for the one sent in SMSG_CLIENT_CONTROL_UPDATE?
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)