Forums WoW Modding Support Archives TrinityCore Discord Archives [DiscordArchive] <@200677690838220800> you don't like std::function due to concerns about performance or abstraction

[DiscordArchive] <@200677690838220800> you don't like std::function due to concerns about performance or abstraction

[DiscordArchive] <@200677690838220800> you don't like std::function due to concerns about performance or abstraction

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
07-07-2025, 08:32 PM
#1
Archived author: Telegrill • Posted: 2025-07-07T20:32:46.172000+00:00
Original source

<@200677690838220800> you don't like std::function due to concerns about performance or abstraction precisely?
rektbyfaith
07-07-2025, 08:32 PM #1

Archived author: Telegrill • Posted: 2025-07-07T20:32:46.172000+00:00
Original source

<@200677690838220800> you don't like std::function due to concerns about performance or abstraction precisely?

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
07-07-2025, 08:33 PM
#2
Archived author: Tea • Posted: 2025-07-07T20:33:13.917000+00:00
Original source

yes, of all the things i wrote you had to focus specifically on that
rektbyfaith
07-07-2025, 08:33 PM #2

Archived author: Tea • Posted: 2025-07-07T20:33:13.917000+00:00
Original source

yes, of all the things i wrote you had to focus specifically on that

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
07-07-2025, 08:33 PM
#3
Archived author: Telegrill • Posted: 2025-07-07T20:33:36.091000+00:00
Original source

no, im just wondering about that one, because the other two I can refactor
rektbyfaith
07-07-2025, 08:33 PM #3

Archived author: Telegrill • Posted: 2025-07-07T20:33:36.091000+00:00
Original source

no, im just wondering about that one, because the other two I can refactor

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
07-07-2025, 08:34 PM
#4
Archived author: Telegrill • Posted: 2025-07-07T20:34:36.642000+00:00
Original source

and change, until it becomes suitable, but you didn't add any argumentation about std::function being bad
rektbyfaith
07-07-2025, 08:34 PM #4

Archived author: Telegrill • Posted: 2025-07-07T20:34:36.642000+00:00
Original source

and change, until it becomes suitable, but you didn't add any argumentation about std::function being bad

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
07-07-2025, 08:34 PM
#5
Archived author: Telegrill • Posted: 2025-07-07T20:34:59.101000+00:00
Original source

that's why I ask, which is fitting
rektbyfaith
07-07-2025, 08:34 PM #5

Archived author: Telegrill • Posted: 2025-07-07T20:34:59.101000+00:00
Original source

that's why I ask, which is fitting

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
07-07-2025, 08:35 PM
#6
Archived author: Warpten • Posted: 2025-07-07T20:35:23.724000+00:00
Original source

`std::function_ref` for the nutjobs
rektbyfaith
07-07-2025, 08:35 PM #6

Archived author: Warpten • Posted: 2025-07-07T20:35:23.724000+00:00
Original source

`std::function_ref` for the nutjobs

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
07-07-2025, 08:35 PM
#7
Archived author: Tea • Posted: 2025-07-07T20:35:28.262000+00:00
Original source

23
rektbyfaith
07-07-2025, 08:35 PM #7

Archived author: Tea • Posted: 2025-07-07T20:35:28.262000+00:00
Original source

23

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
07-07-2025, 08:36 PM
#8
Archived author: Tea • Posted: 2025-07-07T20:36:36.555000+00:00
Original source

also std::function_ref is a massive lifetime trap
rektbyfaith
07-07-2025, 08:36 PM #8

Archived author: Tea • Posted: 2025-07-07T20:36:36.555000+00:00
Original source

also std::function_ref is a massive lifetime trap

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
07-07-2025, 08:37 PM
#9
Archived author: Warpten • Posted: 2025-07-07T20:37:05.458000+00:00
Original source

26 ackthually
rektbyfaith
07-07-2025, 08:37 PM #9

Archived author: Warpten • Posted: 2025-07-07T20:37:05.458000+00:00
Original source

26 ackthually

rektbyfaith
Administrator
0
07-07-2025, 08:37 PM
#10
Archived author: Warpten • Posted: 2025-07-07T20:37:11.603000+00:00
Original source

also yes but
rektbyfaith
07-07-2025, 08:37 PM #10

Archived author: Warpten • Posted: 2025-07-07T20:37:11.603000+00:00
Original source

also yes but

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
Recently Browsing
 1 Guest(s)
Recently Browsing
 1 Guest(s)