[DiscordArchive] <@200677690838220800> you don't like std::function due to concerns about performance or abstraction
[DiscordArchive] <@200677690838220800> you don't like std::function due to concerns about performance or abstraction
Archived author: Telegrill • Posted: 2025-07-07T20:32:46.172000+00:00
Original source
<@200677690838220800> you don't like std::function due to concerns about performance or abstraction precisely?
Archived author: Tea • Posted: 2025-07-07T20:33:13.917000+00:00
Original source
yes, of all the things i wrote you had to focus specifically on that
Archived author: Telegrill • Posted: 2025-07-07T20:33:36.091000+00:00
Original source
no, im just wondering about that one, because the other two I can refactor
Archived author: Telegrill • Posted: 2025-07-07T20:34:36.642000+00:00
Original source
and change, until it becomes suitable, but you didn't add any argumentation about std::function being bad
Archived author: Telegrill • Posted: 2025-07-07T20:34:59.101000+00:00
Original source
that's why I ask, which is fitting
Archived author: Warpten • Posted: 2025-07-07T20:35:23.724000+00:00
Original source
`std::function_ref` for the nutjobs
Archived author: Tea • Posted: 2025-07-07T20:35:28.262000+00:00
Original source
23
Archived author: Tea • Posted: 2025-07-07T20:36:36.555000+00:00
Original source
also std::function_ref is a massive lifetime trap
Archived author: Warpten • Posted: 2025-07-07T20:37:05.458000+00:00
Original source
26 ackthually
Archived author: Warpten • Posted: 2025-07-07T20:37:11.603000+00:00
Original source
also yes but