[DiscordArchive] How recent is considered modern?
[DiscordArchive] How recent is considered modern?
Original source
How recent is considered modern?
rektbyfaith
12-04-2024, 01:02 PM #1Archived author: Frostshake • Posted: 2024-12-04T13:02:39.299000+00:00
Original source
How recent is considered modern?
Original source
I think it started with shadowlands
rektbyfaith
12-04-2024, 01:03 PM #2Archived author: Northstrider • Posted: 2024-12-04T13:03:39.212000+00:00
Original source
I think it started with shadowlands
Original source
Like it's an all new system. It would not work for 335. You can adapt some methods syntax wise but internally, this is a nope
rektbyfaith
12-04-2024, 01:05 PM #3Archived author: Northstrider • Posted: 2024-12-04T13:05:06.377000+00:00
Original source
Like it's an all new system. It would not work for 335. You can adapt some methods syntax wise but internally, this is a nope
Original source
Ok, that may explain my struggles. I've got a fork based on the old wotlk_classic branch working with the 1.14 client, however I had to revert to the 3.3.5 style of enum update fields. I appreciate that it wouldn't be possible as 1:1 replacement, but was hoping to keep a similar syntax e.g
```SetUpdateFieldValue(m_values.ModifyValue(&Unit::m_unitData).ModifyValue(&UF::UnitData:
etExperience), xp);```Anyway, thanks for your insight
rektbyfaith
12-04-2024, 01:09 PM #4Archived author: Frostshake • Posted: 2024-12-04T13:09:38.133000+00:00
Original source
Ok, that may explain my struggles. I've got a fork based on the old wotlk_classic branch working with the 1.14 client, however I had to revert to the 3.3.5 style of enum update fields. I appreciate that it wouldn't be possible as 1:1 replacement, but was hoping to keep a similar syntax e.g
```SetUpdateFieldValue(m_values.ModifyValue(&Unit::m_unitData).ModifyValue(&UF::UnitData:etExperience), xp);```
Anyway, thanks for your insight
Original source
patch 8.1.0 exactly
rektbyfaith
12-04-2024, 01:12 PM #5Archived author: Tea • Posted: 2024-12-04T13:12:20.868000+00:00
Original source
patch 8.1.0 exactly
Original source
i have no idea which system is used in 1.14, never looked at it
rektbyfaith
12-04-2024, 01:13 PM #6Archived author: Tea • Posted: 2024-12-04T13:13:17.877000+00:00
Original source
i have no idea which system is used in 1.14, never looked at it
Original source
1.14 used modern UF iirc
rektbyfaith
12-04-2024, 01:21 PM #7Archived author: MaxtorCoder • Posted: 2024-12-04T13:21:19.536000+00:00
Original source
1.14 used modern UF iirc
Original source
1.14.3/2.5.4 is when they switched to the modern UFs for classic
rektbyfaith
12-04-2024, 01:22 PM #8Archived author: Stitchen • Posted: 2024-12-04T13:22:04.265000+00:00
Original source
1.14.3/2.5.4 is when they switched to the modern UFs for classic
Original source
That may explain why hermes proxy stopping then, I do recall someone else saying the structures changes significantly then. I still fancy having a go at using the modern syntax for getting/setting - I'd like to think it'd would be possible/easier for me to update to one of the 1.15.x clients in the future
rektbyfaith
12-04-2024, 01:26 PM #9Archived author: Frostshake • Posted: 2024-12-04T13:26:40.416000+00:00
Original source
That may explain why hermes proxy stopping then, I do recall someone else saying the structures changes significantly then. I still fancy having a go at using the modern syntax for getting/setting - I'd like to think it'd would be possible/easier for me to update to one of the 1.15.x clients in the future
Original source
ngl im not entirely satisfied with the syntex (im the author of this verbose blaaargh)
rektbyfaith
12-04-2024, 01:27 PM #10Archived author: Tea • Posted: 2024-12-04T13:27:29.926000+00:00
Original source
ngl im not entirely satisfied with the syntex (im the author of this verbose blaaargh)
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)