[DiscordArchive] And how does directly manipulating member variables solve this problem?
[DiscordArchive] And how does directly manipulating member variables solve this problem?
Original source
And how does directly manipulating member variables solve this problem?
rektbyfaith
06-13-2024, 10:41 PM #1Archived author: stoneharry • Posted: 2024-06-13T22:41:48.753000+00:00
Original source
And how does directly manipulating member variables solve this problem?
Original source
To be fair, using setters/getters set you up for future logic (if/when it's needed) without having to change all your direct member variable calls ♂️
rektbyfaith
06-13-2024, 10:42 PM #2Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2024-06-13T22:42:39.875000+00:00
Original source
To be fair, using setters/getters set you up for future logic (if/when it's needed) without having to change all your direct member variable calls ♂️
Original source
Seems like a win/win for me
rektbyfaith
06-13-2024, 10:42 PM #3Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2024-06-13T22:42:44.668000+00:00
Original source
Seems like a win/win for me
Original source
The behaviour isn't described anywhere, and arguably it should trigger whatever is supposed to be triggered when the timer expires. It doesn't
rektbyfaith
06-13-2024, 10:42 PM #4Archived author: chipzz • Posted: 2024-06-13T22:42:49.831000+00:00
Original source
The behaviour isn't described anywhere, and arguably it should trigger whatever is supposed to be triggered when the timer expires. It doesn't
Original source
Fourth, you shouldn't be modifying the interval in the first place. I doubt theres a lot if any cases at all where this makes sense
rektbyfaith
06-13-2024, 10:43 PM #5Archived author: chipzz • Posted: 2024-06-13T22:43:41.963000+00:00
Original source
Fourth, you shouldn't be modifying the interval in the first place. I doubt theres a lot if any cases at all where this makes sense
Original source
It's a documentation issue, not a code problem. Direct variable manipulation does not help at all here, it only brings disadvantages.
rektbyfaith
06-13-2024, 10:43 PM #6Archived author: stoneharry • Posted: 2024-06-13T22:43:46.389000+00:00
Original source
It's a documentation issue, not a code problem. Direct variable manipulation does not help at all here, it only brings disadvantages.
Original source
And for the few cases where it does make sense, you should probably delete your timer and make. a new one
rektbyfaith
06-13-2024, 10:43 PM #7Archived author: chipzz • Posted: 2024-06-13T22:43:58.631000+00:00
Original source
And for the few cases where it does make sense, you should probably delete your timer and make. a new one
Original source
That really depends on the internal variable though..
rektbyfaith
06-13-2024, 10:44 PM #8Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2024-06-13T22:44:00.324000+00:00
Original source
That really depends on the internal variable though..
Original source
One does not need to solve use cases that are not likely to occur
rektbyfaith
06-13-2024, 10:44 PM #9Archived author: stoneharry • Posted: 2024-06-13T22:44:09.282000+00:00
Original source
One does not need to solve use cases that are not likely to occur
Original source
If you shouldn't modify a variable, you shouldn't have an externally available setter
rektbyfaith
06-13-2024, 10:44 PM #10Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2024-06-13T22:44:23.339000+00:00
Original source
If you shouldn't modify a variable, you shouldn't have an externally available setter