[DiscordArchive] I assue u have auth challenge, auth session and encrypt mode (both sides). and then auth challenge?
[DiscordArchive] I assue u have auth challenge, auth session and encrypt mode (both sides). and then auth challenge?
Original source
I assue u have auth challenge, auth session and encrypt mode (both sides). and then auth challenge?
rektbyfaith
06-01-2024, 01:40 PM #1Archived author: Fabian • Posted: 2024-06-01T13:40:14.473000+00:00
Original source
I assue u have auth challenge, auth session and encrypt mode (both sides). and then auth challenge?
Original source
after the basic wow string init exchange
i send SMSG_AUTH_CHALLENGE
i receive CMSG_AUTH_SESSION
i send SMSG_ENTER_ENCRYPTED_MODE
i receive CMSG_ENTER_ENCRYPTED_MODE_ACK
i send SMSG_AUTH_RESPONSE and after i send this packet the client disconnects, i can do sleep(3) and client dcs 3 sec later
again i checked every hmac hash, encrypt bshit, its all good (i think, at least its equal to my nodejs code input output)
rektbyfaith
06-01-2024, 01:45 PM #2Archived author: Widget • Posted: 2024-06-01T13:45:19.205000+00:00
Original source
after the basic wow string init exchange
i send SMSG_AUTH_CHALLENGE
i receive CMSG_AUTH_SESSION
i send SMSG_ENTER_ENCRYPTED_MODE
i receive CMSG_ENTER_ENCRYPTED_MODE_ACK
i send SMSG_AUTH_RESPONSE and after i send this packet the client disconnects, i can do sleep(3) and client dcs 3 sec later
again i checked every hmac hash, encrypt bshit, its all good (i think, at least its equal to my nodejs code input output)
Original source
I mean if u passed the enable crypt check on client side that should be allright
rektbyfaith
06-01-2024, 01:49 PM #3Archived author: Fabian • Posted: 2024-06-01T13:49:32.583000+00:00
Original source
I mean if u passed the enable crypt check on client side that should be allright
Original source
and your packet after that is just wrong
rektbyfaith
06-01-2024, 01:49 PM #4Archived author: Fabian • Posted: 2024-06-01T13:49:38.060000+00:00
Original source
and your packet after that is just wrong
Original source
i spun up my node code and logged in with client, logged the packet body buffer (before encryption) and literally sent it from here and i dc
![[Image: image.png?ex=690bfed7&is=690aad57&hm=cda...147fd847f&]](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/376074396915335170/1246460810671427734/image.png?ex=690bfed7&is=690aad57&hm=cdac19ebcafb9f8d6748e9b4d999832fe2aeccebc1fa867a8ba4e42147fd847f&)
rektbyfaith
06-01-2024, 01:50 PM #5Archived author: Widget • Posted: 2024-06-01T13:50:15.408000+00:00
Original source
i spun up my node code and logged in with client, logged the packet body buffer (before encryption) and literally sent it from here and i dc
Original source
its uint8 just typo i made after i cleaned it
rektbyfaith
06-01-2024, 01:51 PM #6Archived author: Widget • Posted: 2024-06-01T13:51:25.846000+00:00
Original source
its uint8 just typo i made after i cleaned it
Original source
but even if i create basic response packet, send uint32 response code and then one byte of bitstream that has false false in it (authinfo, successinfo) same result, that packet is not complicated at all
rektbyfaith
06-01-2024, 01:52 PM #7Archived author: Widget • Posted: 2024-06-01T13:52:54.135000+00:00
Original source
but even if i create basic response packet, send uint32 response code and then one byte of bitstream that has false false in it (authinfo, successinfo) same result, that packet is not complicated at all
Original source
the only possible explanation could be wrong encryption of the packet, duh, but when i log the encryption key, the input buffer to be encrypted, the encrypted buffer and tag and i recreate the same behaviour on my nodejs code, i get the exactly same values, so i doubt thats wrong
rektbyfaith
06-01-2024, 01:58 PM #8Archived author: Widget • Posted: 2024-06-01T13:58:09.680000+00:00
Original source
the only possible explanation could be wrong encryption of the packet, duh, but when i log the encryption key, the input buffer to be encrypted, the encrypted buffer and tag and i recreate the same behaviour on my nodejs code, i get the exactly same values, so i doubt thats wrong
Original source
Shauren, is there a specific reason why ie. efsw requires you to build with dynamic libraries? It seems to build just fine without BUILD_SHARED_LIBS, and I kinda don't want to force people to use shared libs to use efsw with Eluna. Do mind I only tested on Windows so far though
rektbyfaith
06-01-2024, 02:01 PM #9Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2024-06-01T14:01:13.154000+00:00
Original source
Shauren, is there a specific reason why ie. efsw requires you to build with dynamic libraries? It seems to build just fine without BUILD_SHARED_LIBS, and I kinda don't want to force people to use shared libs to use efsw with Eluna. Do mind I only tested on Windows so far though
Original source
Or anyone else for that matter, doesn't have to be Shauren specifically
rektbyfaith
06-01-2024, 02:03 PM #10Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2024-06-01T14:03:20.209000+00:00
Original source
Or anyone else for that matter, doesn't have to be Shauren specifically