[DiscordArchive] at that point the functions you call should just hand you the resources and it'd be the same as AddS
[DiscordArchive] at that point the functions you call should just hand you the resources and it'd be the same as AddS
Original source
at that point the functions you call should just hand you the resources and it'd be the same as AddSC, no?
rektbyfaith
09-11-2022, 05:42 PM #1Archived author: <o> • Posted: 2022-09-11T17:42:24.804000+00:00
Original source
at that point the functions you call should just hand you the resources and it'd be the same as AddSC, no?
Original source
But this could fully automate object leaking, if it works
rektbyfaith
09-11-2022, 05:42 PM #2Archived author: Sovak • Posted: 2022-09-11T17:42:57.492000+00:00
Original source
But this could fully automate object leaking, if it works
Original source
I would just need to call the "AddSC" function once
rektbyfaith
09-11-2022, 05:43 PM #3Archived author: Sovak • Posted: 2022-09-11T17:43:09.475000+00:00
Original source
I would just need to call the "AddSC" function once
Original source
i'm not sure exactly what you're suggesting but generally you can't cause things to init or do anything before explicitly accessing them somewhere first, so your function would need to return those thing to whoever is accepting them
rektbyfaith
09-11-2022, 05:45 PM #4Archived author: <o> • Posted: 2022-09-11T17:45:46.547000+00:00
Original source
i'm not sure exactly what you're suggesting but generally you can't cause things to init or do anything before explicitly accessing them somewhere first, so your function would need to return those thing to whoever is accepting them
Original source
it's not just a linker issue, c++ standard allows implementations to ignore global variables completely until someone asks for them
rektbyfaith
09-11-2022, 05:46 PM #5Archived author: <o> • Posted: 2022-09-11T17:46:32.988000+00:00
Original source
it's not just a linker issue, c++ standard allows implementations to ignore global variables completely until someone asks for them
Original source
but i'm assuming you're doing this for "auto-registering" test cases in the way i'm imagining
rektbyfaith
09-11-2022, 05:49 PM #6Archived author: <o> • Posted: 2022-09-11T17:49:19.436000+00:00
Original source
but i'm assuming you're doing this for "auto-registering" test cases in the way i'm imagining
Original source
This seems to work All you have to do is reference LeakTests() from the TU, which has a function, to run any test by the name
![[Image: unknown.png?ex=690c372b&is=690ae5ab&hm=4...2b77a7d8a&]](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/376074396915335170/1018579325357916220/unknown.png?ex=690c372b&is=690ae5ab&hm=4c3a34f8f41f2c01256b6e61dc7cc2f278692b8e8d54a87fbf1ea1e2b77a7d8a&)
rektbyfaith
09-11-2022, 05:50 PM #7Archived author: Sovak • Posted: 2022-09-11T17:50:35.496000+00:00
Original source
This seems to work All you have to do is reference LeakTests() from the TU, which has a function, to run any test by the name
Original source
on msvc that will generally work, but it's udb
rektbyfaith
09-11-2022, 05:50 PM #8Archived author: <o> • Posted: 2022-09-11T17:50:55.813000+00:00
Original source
on msvc that will generally work, but it's udb
Original source
How is it though? Getting the tests count requires the tests to be inserted, which is a side effect of the ctors
rektbyfaith
09-11-2022, 05:51 PM #9Archived author: Sovak • Posted: 2022-09-11T17:51:48.160000+00:00
Original source
How is it though? Getting the tests count requires the tests to be inserted, which is a side effect of the ctors
Original source
So they are forced to be linked in
rektbyfaith
09-11-2022, 05:51 PM #10Archived author: Sovak • Posted: 2022-09-11T17:51:54.768000+00:00
Original source
So they are forced to be linked in
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)