[DiscordArchive] Is there a reason why it has to be a SSH tunnel?
[DiscordArchive] Is there a reason why it has to be a SSH tunnel?
Original source
Is there a reason why it has to be a SSH tunnel?
rektbyfaith
01-26-2023, 12:00 AM #1Archived author: Revision • Posted: 2023-01-26T00:00:22.602000+00:00
Original source
Is there a reason why it has to be a SSH tunnel?
Original source
its safer
rektbyfaith
01-26-2023, 12:11 AM #2Archived author: Nyeriah • Posted: 2023-01-26T00:11:44.374000+00:00
Original source
its safer
Original source
if you're using a remote connection, it's the recommended way to access your database
rektbyfaith
01-26-2023, 12:12 AM #3Archived author: Nyeriah • Posted: 2023-01-26T00:12:07.673000+00:00
Original source
if you're using a remote connection, it's the recommended way to access your database
Original source
if you are worried about bruteforce ssh logins, you can always install ipban
rektbyfaith
01-26-2023, 12:13 AM #4Archived author: M'Dic • Posted: 2023-01-26T00:13:24.215000+00:00
Original source
if you are worried about bruteforce ssh logins, you can always install ipban
Original source
the systemctl status ssh shows my connection even and its says "Accepted password for user from .... port 60428 ssh2" and pam creates a session (not using root! - tried root and it was denied since i prohibit that) should i open more listening ports? the exact error from HeidiSQL is "Lost connection to server at 'handschake: reading initial communication packet' system error: 0" I googled a bit with no success yet
rektbyfaith
01-26-2023, 12:20 AM #5Archived author: huptiq • Posted: 2023-01-26T00:20:29.659000+00:00
Original source
the systemctl status ssh shows my connection even and its says "Accepted password for user from .... port 60428 ssh2" and pam creates a session (not using root! - tried root and it was denied since i prohibit that) should i open more listening ports? the exact error from HeidiSQL is "Lost connection to server at 'handschake: reading initial communication packet' system error: 0" I googled a bit with no success yet
Original source
Why not just disallow root access from remote and any users created are set to specific ips? Sounds pretty secure to me.
rektbyfaith
01-26-2023, 12:46 AM #6Archived author: Revision • Posted: 2023-01-26T00:46:18.331000+00:00
Original source
Why not just disallow root access from remote and any users created are set to specific ips? Sounds pretty secure to me.
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)