[DiscordArchive] am I seriously the only one that thinks this is not how it ought to work?
[DiscordArchive] am I seriously the only one that thinks this is not how it ought to work?
Original source
this is a clear inconsistency
rektbyfaith
12-04-2023, 08:47 PM #21Archived author: Nocty1501 • Posted: 2023-12-04T20:47:25.063000+00:00
Original source
this is a clear inconsistency
Original source
I mean, I'm still going to try to fix it
rektbyfaith
12-04-2023, 08:48 PM #22Archived author: Nocty1501 • Posted: 2023-12-04T20:48:00.299000+00:00
Original source
I mean, I'm still going to try to fix it
Original source
but like
rektbyfaith
12-04-2023, 08:48 PM #23Archived author: Nocty1501 • Posted: 2023-12-04T20:48:01.131000+00:00
Original source
but like
Original source
how am I meant to even open tickets on acore's github page if reporting what is clearly a bug is going to get rejected without investigation because I provided no evidence of the behavior not being blizzlike
rektbyfaith
12-04-2023, 08:48 PM #24Archived author: Nocty1501 • Posted: 2023-12-04T20:48:24.719000+00:00
Original source
how am I meant to even open tickets on acore's github page if reporting what is clearly a bug is going to get rejected without investigation because I provided no evidence of the behavior not being blizzlike
Original source
because you didn't provided any evidence
rektbyfaith
12-04-2023, 08:48 PM #25Archived author: Xunjin • Posted: 2023-12-04T20:48:55.045000+00:00
Original source
because you didn't provided any evidence
Original source
you can open it, but not a lot will happen unless someone chooses to investigate the correct behavior
rektbyfaith
12-04-2023, 08:48 PM #26Archived author: Tereneckla • Posted: 2023-12-04T20:48:56.561000+00:00
Original source
you can open it, but not a lot will happen unless someone chooses to investigate the correct behavior
Original source
this approach just means that spells that weren't well-documented 13 years ago will never be fixed
rektbyfaith
12-04-2023, 08:48 PM #27Archived author: Nocty1501 • Posted: 2023-12-04T20:48:56.601000+00:00
Original source
this approach just means that spells that weren't well-documented 13 years ago will never be fixed
Original source
The one opening the issue is to provide evidence usually.
rektbyfaith
12-04-2023, 08:49 PM #28Archived author: Honey • Posted: 2023-12-04T20:49:09.821000+00:00
Original source
The one opening the issue is to provide evidence usually.
Original source
it wont automatically be rejected there will be question for providing proof and it will get closed after few months of inactivity
rektbyfaith
12-04-2023, 08:49 PM #29Archived author: Rymercyble • Posted: 2023-12-04T20:49:28.922000+00:00
Original source
it wont automatically be rejected there will be question for providing proof and it will get closed after few months of inactivity
Original source
please stop saying the word "evidence"
rektbyfaith
12-04-2023, 08:49 PM #30Archived author: Nocty1501 • Posted: 2023-12-04T20:49:32.021000+00:00
Original source
please stop saying the word "evidence"
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)