[DiscordArchive] I believe you can turn that off in the world config?
[DiscordArchive] I believe you can turn that off in the world config?
Original source
Lua is single threaded after all, even in the client, so if you have a loop that executes say 100 update requests, all of those will be sent on the same tick
rektbyfaith
11-13-2023, 04:58 PM #31Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2023-11-13T16:58:37.447000+00:00
Original source
Lua is single threaded after all, even in the client, so if you have a loop that executes say 100 update requests, all of those will be sent on the same tick
Original source
No Lua is async in the client
rektbyfaith
11-13-2023, 04:58 PM #32Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2023-11-13T16:58:44.115000+00:00
Original source
No Lua is async in the client
Original source
Limiting the amount of officer's note updates it does at a time, would that prevent that from becoming an issue or what would be your suggestion? I don't even know why I'm asking, I'm not the one having this issue. <:kek:1065379143887372398>
rektbyfaith
11-13-2023, 05:00 PM #33Archived author: Revision • Posted: 2023-11-13T17:00:11.200000+00:00
Original source
Limiting the amount of officer's note updates it does at a time, would that prevent that from becoming an issue or what would be your suggestion? I don't even know why I'm asking, I'm not the one having this issue. <:kek:1065379143887372398>
Original source
yes ofc but that addon was not designed that way so u would have to have ur own version for ur server
rektbyfaith
11-13-2023, 05:00 PM #34Archived author: Rymercyble • Posted: 2023-11-13T17:00:49.536000+00:00
Original source
yes ofc but that addon was not designed that way so u would have to have ur own version for ur server
Original source
Ideally these packets should be queued, then you execute x amount of packets per server tick
rektbyfaith
11-13-2023, 05:00 PM #35Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2023-11-13T17:00:59.494000+00:00
Original source
Ideally these packets should be queued, then you execute x amount of packets per server tick
Original source
Instead of basing a "malicious" activity on a single number received in a single tick, you'd look at averages
rektbyfaith
11-13-2023, 05:01 PM #36Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2023-11-13T17:01:22.228000+00:00
Original source
Instead of basing a "malicious" activity on a single number received in a single tick, you'd look at averages
Original source
If a client starts blowing up your queue, you could then discard those packets before processing them and kick the player
rektbyfaith
11-13-2023, 05:02 PM #37Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2023-11-13T17:02:17.314000+00:00
Original source
If a client starts blowing up your queue, you could then discard those packets before processing them and kick the player
Original source
All of this actually makes me realize why I sometimes get kicked on login. Jamba getting all that information from all characters at once, it does explain it.
rektbyfaith
11-13-2023, 05:02 PM #38Archived author: Revision • Posted: 2023-11-13T17:02:38.493000+00:00
Original source
All of this actually makes me realize why I sometimes get kicked on login. Jamba getting all that information from all characters at once, it does explain it.
Original source
It's a simple way to deal with a flood attack before the flooding starts, but it's prone to cause false positives and it's not very flexible
rektbyfaith
11-13-2023, 05:03 PM #39Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2023-11-13T17:03:25.778000+00:00
Original source
It's a simple way to deal with a flood attack before the flooding starts, but it's prone to cause false positives and it's not very flexible
Original source
A queue and average analysis is definitely more complex
rektbyfaith
11-13-2023, 05:03 PM #40Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2023-11-13T17:03:39.537000+00:00
Original source
A queue and average analysis is definitely more complex
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)