[DiscordArchive] Which extracted files would that be?
[DiscordArchive] Which extracted files would that be?
Original source
Technically, of course
rektbyfaith
10-30-2023, 05:45 PM #11Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2023-10-30T17:45:31.973000+00:00
Original source
Technically, of course
Original source
The emulator is nothing owned by blizzard? Its nothing that leaked from blizzard. Its reverse engineered and blizzard basically encourages people to keep modding their games, as long as you don't share copyright protected assets or monetize it.
rektbyfaith
10-30-2023, 05:46 PM #12Archived author: wakemeup • Posted: 2023-10-30T17:46:20.974000+00:00
Original source
The emulator is nothing owned by blizzard? Its nothing that leaked from blizzard. Its reverse engineered and blizzard basically encourages people to keep modding their games, as long as you don't share copyright protected assets or monetize it.
Original source
Correct, none of it is blizzard property
rektbyfaith
10-30-2023, 05:46 PM #13Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2023-10-30T17:46:32.645000+00:00
Original source
Correct, none of it is blizzard property
Original source
None of it is leaked blizz code, if it was then the emulator wouldn't exist, that would have been taken down extremely fast
rektbyfaith
10-30-2023, 05:48 PM #14Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2023-10-30T17:48:13.153000+00:00
Original source
None of it is leaked blizz code, if it was then the emulator wouldn't exist, that would have been taken down extremely fast
Original source
Right. Maybe can we take a step back, why was this topic of such importance to you?
rektbyfaith
10-30-2023, 05:49 PM #15Archived author: wakemeup • Posted: 2023-10-30T17:49:59.273000+00:00
Original source
Right. Maybe can we take a step back, why was this topic of such importance to you?
Original source
It was just interesting that it was pointed out that providing the client was illegal, when the project already provides data in breach of the exact same copyright, nothing more or less
rektbyfaith
10-30-2023, 05:51 PM #16Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2023-10-30T17:51:17.141000+00:00
Original source
It was just interesting that it was pointed out that providing the client was illegal, when the project already provides data in breach of the exact same copyright, nothing more or less
Original source
It's not of very major importance at all
rektbyfaith
10-30-2023, 05:51 PM #17Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2023-10-30T17:51:28.808000+00:00
Original source
It's not of very major importance at all
Original source
Hm okey, just got the feeling that it was somehow bothering you and I thought maybe there was some previous argument I didnt know about. Since you started pointing out "hypocricy". That made it seem like there is something personal going on.
rektbyfaith
10-30-2023, 05:54 PM #18Archived author: wakemeup • Posted: 2023-10-30T17:54:10.220000+00:00
Original source
Hm okey, just got the feeling that it was somehow bothering you and I thought maybe there was some previous argument I didnt know about. Since you started pointing out "hypocricy". That made it seem like there is something personal going on.
Original source
Nah, I don't have a beef with anyone, I personally don't care at all. It is what it is, and just a weird line to draw in my opinion, to provide A but not B when they are the same thing
rektbyfaith
10-30-2023, 05:56 PM #19Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2023-10-30T17:56:46.484000+00:00
Original source
Nah, I don't have a beef with anyone, I personally don't care at all. It is what it is, and just a weird line to draw in my opinion, to provide A but not B when they are the same thing
Original source
Especially basing that stance on B being illegal
rektbyfaith
10-30-2023, 05:57 PM #20Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2023-10-30T17:57:10.414000+00:00
Original source
Especially basing that stance on B being illegal
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)