[DiscordArchive] isnt main idea to remove that lag from rest of map where action is not happening ?
[DiscordArchive] isnt main idea to remove that lag from rest of map where action is not happening ?
Original source
isnt main idea to remove that lag from rest of map where action is not happening ?
rektbyfaith
01-17-2025, 04:37 PM #1Archived author: Rymercyble • Posted: 2025-01-17T16:37:37.518000+00:00
Original source
isnt main idea to remove that lag from rest of map where action is not happening ?
Original source
What
rektbyfaith
01-17-2025, 04:40 PM #2Archived author: Takenbacon • Posted: 2025-01-17T16:40:22.003000+00:00
Original source
What
Original source
imagine there is 40v40 fight in wintergrasp then entire northrend is adding to lag of that fight and that fight is lagging entire northrend
rektbyfaith
01-17-2025, 04:41 PM #3Archived author: Rymercyble • Posted: 2025-01-17T16:41:27.448000+00:00
Original source
imagine there is 40v40 fight in wintergrasp then entire northrend is adding to lag of that fight and that fight is lagging entire northrend
Original source
What lag? I think you refer to reducing update times. Takenbacon has just explained the gains of splitting the map.
rektbyfaith
01-17-2025, 04:41 PM #4Archived author: Honey • Posted: 2025-01-17T16:41:27.690000+00:00
Original source
What lag? I think you refer to reducing update times. Takenbacon has just explained the gains of splitting the map.
Original source
sure but like why are we looking into single benefit of multiple
rektbyfaith
01-17-2025, 04:42 PM #5Archived author: Rymercyble • Posted: 2025-01-17T16:42:00.688000+00:00
Original source
sure but like why are we looking into single benefit of multiple
Original source
I see your point.
If you have issues with 80 players in a 500x500m zone where only like 20 of them will see and interact with each other simultaneously, i expect optimization being in order instead of splitting the map into threads.
rektbyfaith
01-17-2025, 04:44 PM #6Archived author: Honey • Posted: 2025-01-17T16:44:03.134000+00:00
Original source
I see your point.
If you have issues with 80 players in a 500x500m zone where only like 20 of them will see and interact with each other simultaneously, i expect optimization being in order instead of splitting the map into threads.
Original source
I can think of a thing like the opening of the dark portal or ahn'qiraj where 4 digits of players are in the same spot benefiting locally from additional layers. And i can also think of the remaining map benefiting a lot from multiple threads per map in a way similar to the proposal we're talking about.
But wintergrasp? That's just a couple players. Every raid has that.
rektbyfaith
01-17-2025, 04:45 PM #7Archived author: Honey • Posted: 2025-01-17T16:45:39.885000+00:00
Original source
I can think of a thing like the opening of the dark portal or ahn'qiraj where 4 digits of players are in the same spot benefiting locally from additional layers. And i can also think of the remaining map benefiting a lot from multiple threads per map in a way similar to the proposal we're talking about.
But wintergrasp? That's just a couple players. Every raid has that.
Original source
order of what ? it would create lag in update cycle of entire map
rektbyfaith
01-17-2025, 04:45 PM #8Archived author: Rymercyble • Posted: 2025-01-17T16:45:47.740000+00:00
Original source
order of what ? it would create lag in update cycle of entire map
Original source
being in order as in making sense
rektbyfaith
01-17-2025, 04:46 PM #9Archived author: Honey • Posted: 2025-01-17T16:46:18.938000+00:00
Original source
being in order as in making sense
Original source
If you have too high update times from wintergrasp, you're using the wrong hardware honestly.
rektbyfaith
01-17-2025, 04:46 PM #10Archived author: Honey • Posted: 2025-01-17T16:46:43.486000+00:00
Original source
If you have too high update times from wintergrasp, you're using the wrong hardware honestly.
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)