[DiscordArchive] where would be good place in core to put custom code(file) so that its accessible in whole core and
[DiscordArchive] where would be good place in core to put custom code(file) so that its accessible in whole core and
Original source
where would be good place in core to put custom code(file) so that its accessible in whole core and modules ?
rektbyfaith
01-17-2024, 04:04 PM #1Archived author: Rymercyble • Posted: 2024-01-17T16:04:13.147000+00:00
Original source
where would be good place in core to put custom code(file) so that its accessible in whole core and modules ?
Original source
In its own folder, with a CMake switch?
rektbyfaith
01-17-2024, 04:13 PM #2Archived author: Natrist • Posted: 2024-01-17T16:13:30.983000+00:00
Original source
In its own folder, with a CMake switch?
Original source
Unpopular opinino here but I think anything custom shouldn't be part of the core code.
rektbyfaith
01-17-2024, 04:13 PM #3Archived author: Natrist • Posted: 2024-01-17T16:13:49.603000+00:00
Original source
Unpopular opinino here but I think anything custom shouldn't be part of the core code.
Original source
opinino = opinion
rektbyfaith
01-17-2024, 04:13 PM #4Archived author: Natrist • Posted: 2024-01-17T16:13:57.521000+00:00
Original source
opinino = opinion
Original source
should i add it to module and include module file in core instead ?
rektbyfaith
01-17-2024, 04:17 PM #5Archived author: Rymercyble • Posted: 2024-01-17T16:17:19.529000+00:00
Original source
should i add it to module and include module file in core instead ?
Original source
https://tenor.com/view/dog-smile-shyboos...f-24233810
rektbyfaith
01-17-2024, 04:17 PM #6Archived author: Rymercyble • Posted: 2024-01-17T16:17:23.882000+00:00
Original source
https://tenor.com/view/dog-smile-shyboos...f-24233810
Original source
I don't remember who proposed using a dynamic library for modules but I think that's probably one of the better ways to implement custom functionality.
rektbyfaith
01-17-2024, 04:24 PM #7Archived author: Natrist • Posted: 2024-01-17T16:24:16.679000+00:00
Original source
I don't remember who proposed using a dynamic library for modules but I think that's probably one of the better ways to implement custom functionality.
Original source
thinking about it i could add it as dependency...not that it makes much sense but it would work
rektbyfaith
01-17-2024, 04:24 PM #8Archived author: Rymercyble • Posted: 2024-01-17T16:24:22.977000+00:00
Original source
thinking about it i could add it as dependency...not that it makes much sense but it would work
Original source
im not against it but it would still be module limited to using hooks which is useless in case where u are changing how core works
rektbyfaith
01-17-2024, 04:26 PM #9Archived author: Rymercyble • Posted: 2024-01-17T16:26:37.716000+00:00
Original source
im not against it but it would still be module limited to using hooks which is useless in case where u are changing how core works
Original source
on other hand if it would be reworked from hooks to implementation swap that would be something
rektbyfaith
01-17-2024, 04:27 PM #10Archived author: Rymercyble • Posted: 2024-01-17T16:27:29.593000+00:00
Original source
on other hand if it would be reworked from hooks to implementation swap that would be something
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)