[DiscordArchive] I can double check this part, but I think I added patch for spell.dbc. Also is it possible that I ne
[DiscordArchive] I can double check this part, but I think I added patch for spell.dbc. Also is it possible that I ne
Original source
but that will send that patch to client its just that this does it for u and it can update existing patch file instead of u having to handle it or having ton of them
rektbyfaith
11-08-2023, 05:09 PM #31Archived author: Rymercyble • Posted: 2023-11-08T17:09:44.988000+00:00
Original source
but that will send that patch to client its just that this does it for u and it can update existing patch file instead of u having to handle it or having ton of them
Original source
instead of ppl downloading patch and adding it to folder (or ur custom lanucher doing it) this does it
rektbyfaith
11-08-2023, 05:11 PM #32Archived author: Rymercyble • Posted: 2023-11-08T17:11:15.905000+00:00
Original source
instead of ppl downloading patch and adding it to folder (or ur custom lanucher doing it) this does it
Original source
Right I understand that. I mean that I would prefer to use an auto patcher and have that as a built in part of AC. That way I can setup patches server side to go out to "users" (not that I have many). But without a patch tool like that I don't plan on doing any changes that would require a client side change. (one of the players is my mother, who is in her 60's and not very saavy beyond basic Office products).
rektbyfaith
11-08-2023, 05:25 PM #33Archived author: Abillister • Posted: 2023-11-08T17:25:57.234000+00:00
Original source
Right I understand that. I mean that I would prefer to use an auto patcher and have that as a built in part of AC. That way I can setup patches server side to go out to "users" (not that I have many). But without a patch tool like that I don't plan on doing any changes that would require a client side change. (one of the players is my mother, who is in her 60's and not very saavy beyond basic Office products).
Original source
<@169121237539356673> you asshole
rektbyfaith
11-08-2023, 05:27 PM #34Archived author: Natrist • Posted: 2023-11-08T17:27:27.753000+00:00
Original source
<@169121237539356673> you asshole
Original source
One problem I see, if I understood it right you as the server owner actually deliver the .exe file (that Blizzard downloader/updater) to be executed on the players machine.
Which I don't really like from a security perspective.
But, instead of disabling the signature check, we could maybe just create a new AC signature, and then provide "safe" exe files. I don't know how that works yet, might not be possible
rektbyfaith
11-08-2023, 05:27 PM #35Archived author: Dedmen (∩｀-´)⊃━☆ﾟ.*･｡ﾟ /\(O_O)/\ • Posted: 2023-11-08T17:27:31.340000+00:00
Original source
One problem I see, if I understood it right you as the server owner actually deliver the .exe file (that Blizzard downloader/updater) to be executed on the players machine.
Which I don't really like from a security perspective.
But, instead of disabling the signature check, we could maybe just create a new AC signature, and then provide "safe" exe files. I don't know how that works yet, might not be possible
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)