[DiscordArchive] I can double check this part, but I think I added patch for spell.dbc. Also is it possible that I ne
[DiscordArchive] I can double check this part, but I think I added patch for spell.dbc. Also is it possible that I ne
Original source
when u are mentioning that foe
rektbyfaith
11-08-2023, 04:54 PM #21Archived author: Rymercyble • Posted: 2023-11-08T16:54:35.276000+00:00
Original source
when u are mentioning that foe
Original source
is it possible to run that patcher headless ? so i could have custom launcher and ppl wouldnt see that 15 year old app
rektbyfaith
11-08-2023, 04:55 PM #22Archived author: Rymercyble • Posted: 2023-11-08T16:55:07.154000+00:00
Original source
is it possible to run that patcher headless ? so i could have custom launcher and ppl wouldnt see that 15 year old app
Original source
no
rektbyfaith
11-08-2023, 04:55 PM #23Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2023-11-08T16:55:19.899000+00:00
Original source
no
Original source
rektbyfaith
11-08-2023, 04:55 PM #24Archived author: Rymercyble • Posted: 2023-11-08T16:55:35.421000+00:00
Original source
Original source
https://github.com/stoneharry/Blizzard-Updater
https://github.com/stoneharry/Blizzard-Downloader
rektbyfaith
11-08-2023, 04:57 PM #25Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2023-11-08T16:57:19.695000+00:00
Original source
https://github.com/stoneharry/Blizzard-Updater
https://github.com/stoneharry/Blizzard-Downloader
Original source
You have these as well for the actual downloader you send to the client during patching, and the updater that updates the client
rektbyfaith
11-08-2023, 04:57 PM #26Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2023-11-08T16:57:39.497000+00:00
Original source
You have these as well for the actual downloader you send to the client during patching, and the updater that updates the client
Original source
That's what the updater looks like
![[Image: 68747470733a2f2f692e696d6775722e636f6d2f...deb00d33d&]](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/284323424032129024/1171856267397050408/68747470733a2f2f692e696d6775722e636f6d2f7a39504f6d704a2e706e67.png?ex=690c2af2&is=690ad972&hm=338c26b8313fca582fb441796858144aaa4204ca4f367a6277d841edeb00d33d&)
rektbyfaith
11-08-2023, 04:58 PM #27Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2023-11-08T16:58:26.285000+00:00
Original source
That's what the updater looks like
Original source
i so much dont want to create custom patcher but that is just too ancient for my taste
rektbyfaith
11-08-2023, 04:59 PM #28Archived author: Rymercyble • Posted: 2023-11-08T16:59:17.426000+00:00
Original source
i so much dont want to create custom patcher but that is just too ancient for my taste
Original source
Being the appearance? I honestly could not care how it looked, as long as it is reliable/functional.
rektbyfaith
11-08-2023, 05:06 PM #29Archived author: Abillister • Posted: 2023-11-08T17:06:46.323000+00:00
Original source
Being the appearance? I honestly could not care how it looked, as long as it is reliable/functional.
Original source
If it allowed us to create some updates that would easily "patch" onto a standard 3.3.5a install that seems pretty awesome. I don't play on doing any updates that require me to send DBC/patch files to a user - if I can't do it server side it aint going to happen. BUT if we had a patch system like that...
rektbyfaith
11-08-2023, 05:08 PM #30Archived author: Abillister • Posted: 2023-11-08T17:08:49.540000+00:00
Original source
If it allowed us to create some updates that would easily "patch" onto a standard 3.3.5a install that seems pretty awesome. I don't play on doing any updates that require me to send DBC/patch files to a user - if I can't do it server side it aint going to happen. BUT if we had a patch system like that...
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)