[DiscordArchive] also splitting it is nice but would there be only 1 of each ?
[DiscordArchive] also splitting it is nice but would there be only 1 of each ?
Original source
also splitting it is nice but would there be only 1 of each ?
rektbyfaith
07-13-2023, 04:25 PM #1Archived author: Rymercyble • Posted: 2023-07-13T16:25:01.404000+00:00
Original source
also splitting it is nice but would there be only 1 of each ?
Original source
For some of the services it doesn't make sense to have an active/active design, but you could feasibly do active/standby for most services
rektbyfaith
07-13-2023, 04:26 PM #2Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2023-07-13T16:26:12.528000+00:00
Original source
For some of the services it doesn't make sense to have an active/active design, but you could feasibly do active/standby for most services
Original source
im just thinking that if doing something like this it wouldnt be bad to keep in mind option to have at least 2 of each in case 1 crashes
rektbyfaith
07-13-2023, 04:26 PM #3Archived author: Rymercyble • Posted: 2023-07-13T16:26:53.925000+00:00
Original source
im just thinking that if doing something like this it wouldnt be bad to keep in mind option to have at least 2 of each in case 1 crashes
Original source
Yeah, that would be active/standby for most cases, for things like the map services you'd probably not get away with that, but you'd have multiple map services, each dedicated to specific maps
rektbyfaith
07-13-2023, 04:27 PM #4Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2023-07-13T16:27:59.866000+00:00
Original source
Yeah, that would be active/standby for most cases, for things like the map services you'd probably not get away with that, but you'd have multiple map services, each dedicated to specific maps
Original source
More for load balancing than redundancy
rektbyfaith
07-13-2023, 04:28 PM #5Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2023-07-13T16:28:16.993000+00:00
Original source
More for load balancing than redundancy
Original source
also would it be 1 chat service for all realms ? i remember cases from retail where somewhere some chat was working and some not
rektbyfaith
07-13-2023, 04:29 PM #6Archived author: Rymercyble • Posted: 2023-07-13T16:29:15.083000+00:00
Original source
also would it be 1 chat service for all realms ? i remember cases from retail where somewhere some chat was working and some not
Original source
I would go by that design personally, it's a lot cleaner to have one service handle it, than the map service handling some, one service handling guild chat, one service handling party chat etc
rektbyfaith
07-13-2023, 04:29 PM #7Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2023-07-13T16:29:54.781000+00:00
Original source
I would go by that design personally, it's a lot cleaner to have one service handle it, than the map service handling some, one service handling guild chat, one service handling party chat etc
Original source
From a load perspective there's no real reason to split those functions, and you could have a hot/cold design. So if chat server 1 dies, chat server 2 takes over almost immediately
rektbyfaith
07-13-2023, 04:30 PM #8Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2023-07-13T16:30:38.764000+00:00
Original source
From a load perspective there's no real reason to split those functions, and you could have a hot/cold design. So if chat server 1 dies, chat server 2 takes over almost immediately
Original source
Not like they really have to consider context for anything, so you could always round-robin across those two services, but I'd much rather have a hot/cold design from a management and maintenance perspective
rektbyfaith
07-13-2023, 04:31 PM #9Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2023-07-13T16:31:48.589000+00:00
Original source
Not like they really have to consider context for anything, so you could always round-robin across those two services, but I'd much rather have a hot/cold design from a management and maintenance perspective
Original source
You could patch Chat2, then migrate master to Chat2, shut down Chat1 and patch that one with no loss in chat functionality
rektbyfaith
07-13-2023, 04:32 PM #10Archived author: Foe • Posted: 2023-07-13T16:32:18.696000+00:00
Original source
You could patch Chat2, then migrate master to Chat2, shut down Chat1 and patch that one with no loss in chat functionality
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)