[DiscordArchive] @here If I had this
[DiscordArchive] @here If I had this
Original source
@here If I had this
```
void UpdateAI(uint32 diff) override
{
(...)
Creature* fireSpirit = me->FindNearestCreature(NPC_FIRE_SPIRIT, 1.0f, true);
(...)
```
Every time that `fireSpirit` pointed to a different creature would I lose the last creature causing a leak? Or is it not dynamically allocated?
rektbyfaith
05-13-2019, 10:25 AM #1Archived author: Claudiodfc • Posted: 2019-05-13T10:25:25.661000+00:00
Original source
@here If I had this
```
void UpdateAI(uint32 diff) override
{
(...)
Creature* fireSpirit = me->FindNearestCreature(NPC_FIRE_SPIRIT, 1.0f, true);
(...)
```
Every time that `fireSpirit` pointed to a different creature would I lose the last creature causing a leak? Or is it not dynamically allocated?
Original source
I'm pretty sure it points to the original creature pointer, so it should be fine.
rektbyfaith
05-13-2019, 10:38 AM #2Archived author: Nix • Posted: 2019-05-13T10:38:53.407000+00:00
Original source
I'm pretty sure it points to the original creature pointer, so it should be fine.
Original source
Thanks
rektbyfaith
05-13-2019, 10:50 AM #3Archived author: Claudiodfc • Posted: 2019-05-13T10:50:03.583000+00:00
Original source
Thanks
Original source
would you point them to nullptr after used <@171604048733011968>?
rektbyfaith
05-13-2019, 10:50 AM #4Archived author: Claudiodfc • Posted: 2019-05-13T10:50:23.299000+00:00
Original source
would you point them to nullptr after used <@171604048733011968>?
Original source
I would probably wrap it like this
```cpp
if (Creature* fireSpirit = me->FindNearestCreature(NPC_FIRE_SPIRIT, 1.0f, true);
{
}
```
rektbyfaith
05-13-2019, 10:56 AM #5Archived author: Nix • Posted: 2019-05-13T10:56:06.793000+00:00
Original source
I would probably wrap it like this
```cpp
if (Creature* fireSpirit = me->FindNearestCreature(NPC_FIRE_SPIRIT, 1.0f, true);
{
}
```
Original source
This way the pointer only exists within the local scope, and you won't have to 'care' about it after you leave the scope.
rektbyfaith
05-13-2019, 10:56 AM #6Archived author: Nix • Posted: 2019-05-13T10:56:42.556000+00:00
Original source
This way the pointer only exists within the local scope, and you won't have to 'care' about it after you leave the scope.
Original source
neat, thanks
rektbyfaith
05-13-2019, 11:00 AM #7Archived author: Claudiodfc • Posted: 2019-05-13T11:00:57.448000+00:00
Original source
neat, thanks
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)