[DiscordArchive] But abbreviations should work, no?
[DiscordArchive] But abbreviations should work, no?
05-24-2025, 02:30 PM
Original source
through sql or dbc editing alone
rektbyfaith
05-24-2025, 02:30 PM #11Archived author: Vorosh • Posted: 2025-05-24T14:30:47.360000+00:00
Original source
through sql or dbc editing alone
05-24-2025, 02:33 PM
Original source
You've to specify "un-instanced". And if you had a repack that worked the way you wanted, asking the author never killed anyone how they did it
rektbyfaith
05-24-2025, 02:33 PM #12Archived author: Ryan Turner • Posted: 2025-05-24T14:33:59.478000+00:00
Original source
You've to specify "un-instanced". And if you had a repack that worked the way you wanted, asking the author never killed anyone how they did it
05-24-2025, 02:40 PM
Original source
The ultimate goal is to allow only 1 concurrent version of any dungeon to exist, in any way possible, even if it is a "band-aid" type of implementation.
rektbyfaith
05-24-2025, 02:40 PM #13Archived author: Vorosh • Posted: 2025-05-24T14:40:25.800000+00:00
Original source
The ultimate goal is to allow only 1 concurrent version of any dungeon to exist, in any way possible, even if it is a "band-aid" type of implementation.
Recently Browsing
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)
Recently Browsing
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)