[DiscordArchive] Arent you going the "We are going to support more than 3.3.5"-route?
[DiscordArchive] Arent you going the "We are going to support more than 3.3.5"-route?
Original source
Arent you going the "We are going to support more than 3.3.5"-route?
rektbyfaith
09-21-2025, 10:45 PM #1Archived author: Saty • Posted: 2025-09-21T22:45:42.725000+00:00
Original source
Arent you going the "We are going to support more than 3.3.5"-route?
Original source
Like what I am saying is purpose built for one specific, never changing version.
rektbyfaith
09-21-2025, 10:46 PM #2Archived author: Saty • Posted: 2025-09-21T22:46:04.922000+00:00
Original source
Like what I am saying is purpose built for one specific, never changing version.
Original source
in the future if possible, but adding core features to 3.3.5 is first priority. And I'd argue you're doing the same mistake you're calling with versioning, "my tool does all" but also is only usable for one version
rektbyfaith
09-21-2025, 10:47 PM #3Archived author: Titi • Posted: 2025-09-21T22:47:14.047000+00:00
Original source
in the future if possible, but adding core features to 3.3.5 is first priority. And I'd argue you're doing the same mistake you're calling with versioning, "my tool does all" but also is only usable for one version
Original source
it can't be standard if it's only one version
rektbyfaith
09-21-2025, 10:47 PM #4Archived author: Titi • Posted: 2025-09-21T22:47:22.846000+00:00
Original source
it can't be standard if it's only one version
Original source
also getting compatibility with classic clients so the community can eventually move on to classic clients is important imo
rektbyfaith
09-21-2025, 10:47 PM #5Archived author: Titi • Posted: 2025-09-21T22:47:49.792000+00:00
Original source
also getting compatibility with classic clients so the community can eventually move on to classic clients is important imo
Original source
There is no point in supporting more than 3.3.5. It only adds headache.
If there is another version worth porting too, it will be a completely different program
rektbyfaith
09-21-2025, 10:48 PM #6Archived author: Saty • Posted: 2025-09-21T22:48:08.621000+00:00
Original source
There is no point in supporting more than 3.3.5. It only adds headache.
If there is another version worth porting too, it will be a completely different program
Original source
that just fragments the community between more tools
rektbyfaith
09-21-2025, 10:48 PM #7Archived author: Titi • Posted: 2025-09-21T22:48:51.423000+00:00
Original source
that just fragments the community between more tools
Original source
The modding community I would say is like 90% or higher on 3.3.5
rektbyfaith
09-21-2025, 10:49 PM #8Archived author: Saty • Posted: 2025-09-21T22:49:13.469000+00:00
Original source
The modding community I would say is like 90% or higher on 3.3.5
Original source
well if there are support for it, 90% would move to 3.4...
rektbyfaith
09-21-2025, 10:49 PM #9Archived author: Titi • Posted: 2025-09-21T22:49:37.252000+00:00
Original source
well if there are support for it, 90% would move to 3.4...
Original source
If you're just editing the DBC tables you might as well import it to SQL and all the benefits that brings.
rektbyfaith
09-21-2025, 10:50 PM #10Archived author: stoneharry • Posted: 2025-09-21T22:50:20.192000+00:00
Original source
If you're just editing the DBC tables you might as well import it to SQL and all the benefits that brings.
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)