[DiscordArchive] <@160857905879449600> should I push changes to repo? or you want the old code to stay as is?
[DiscordArchive] <@160857905879449600> should I push changes to repo? or you want the old code to stay as is?
Original source
too many strings
rektbyfaith
11-05-2018, 10:31 AM #21Archived author: Skarn • Posted: 2018-11-05T10:31:17.470000+00:00
Original source
too many strings
Original source
I really am contra >minor ranges and in favor of new a new syntax for "entire expansion" like `VERSION 3` as given above. May even be `VERSION 3.2`. In fact, one can probably just make the build grammar to be `[0-9]+(\.[0-9]+(\.[0-9]+){0,1}){0,1}` ish so ranges still work
rektbyfaith
11-05-2018, 10:36 AM #22Archived author: schlumpf • Posted: 2018-11-05T10:36:06.085000+00:00
Original source
I really am contra >minor ranges and in favor of new a new syntax for "entire expansion" like `VERSION 3` as given above. May even be `VERSION 3.2`. In fact, one can probably just make the build grammar to be `[0-9]+(\.[0-9]+(\.[0-9]+){0,1}){0,1}` ish so ranges still work
Original source
with symmetry of course, so I'd not allow `3.2-3.3.5` but `3.3.0-3.3.5` should be fine imho
rektbyfaith
11-05-2018, 10:36 AM #23Archived author: schlumpf • Posted: 2018-11-05T10:36:26.382000+00:00
Original source
with symmetry of course, so I'd not allow `3.2-3.3.5` but `3.3.0-3.3.5` should be fine imho
Original source
which is of course equivalent to `3.3`
rektbyfaith
11-05-2018, 10:36 AM #24Archived author: schlumpf • Posted: 2018-11-05T10:36:39.161000+00:00
Original source
which is of course equivalent to `3.3`
Original source
what's the issue with 3.2 - 3.3.5?
rektbyfaith
11-05-2018, 10:36 AM #25Archived author: Skarn • Posted: 2018-11-05T10:36:51.753000+00:00
Original source
what's the issue with 3.2 - 3.3.5?
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)