[DiscordArchive] so i just assume with is a void * and that's it?
[DiscordArchive] so i just assume with is a void * and that's it?
Original source
so i just assume with is a void * and that's it?
rektbyfaith
10-13-2018, 01:52 PM #1Archived author: Skarn • Posted: 2018-10-13T13:52:37.766000+00:00
Original source
so i just assume with is a void * and that's it?
Original source
You don’t assume anything. Just don’t. It is sizeof(HANDLE) bytes of memory you copy. Don’t bother what it is.
rektbyfaith
10-13-2018, 01:53 PM #2Archived author: schlumpf • Posted: 2018-10-13T13:53:16.922000+00:00
Original source
You don’t assume anything. Just don’t. It is sizeof(HANDLE) bytes of memory you copy. Don’t bother what it is.
Original source
but I need to pass stuff to it?
rektbyfaith
10-13-2018, 01:53 PM #3Archived author: Skarn • Posted: 2018-10-13T13:53:51.328000+00:00
Original source
but I need to pass stuff to it?
Original source
Windows defines HANDLE as void *, and some userland Windows libraries store pointers to internal data structures in it
rektbyfaith
10-13-2018, 01:53 PM #4Archived author: Quantam • Posted: 2018-10-13T13:53:59.237000+00:00
Original source
Windows defines HANDLE as void *, and some userland Windows libraries store pointers to internal data structures in it
Original source
You don’t need to pass stuff to the handle? You just pass it into the functions.
rektbyfaith
10-13-2018, 01:54 PM #5Archived author: schlumpf • Posted: 2018-10-13T13:54:52.207000+00:00
Original source
You don’t need to pass stuff to the handle? You just pass it into the functions.
Original source
There is no difference to it being an int or anything.
rektbyfaith
10-13-2018, 01:55 PM #6Archived author: schlumpf • Posted: 2018-10-13T13:55:06.524000+00:00
Original source
There is no difference to it being an int or anything.
Original source
yeah but handle is the type of file argument?
rektbyfaith
10-13-2018, 01:55 PM #7Archived author: Skarn • Posted: 2018-10-13T13:55:09.648000+00:00
Original source
yeah but handle is the type of file argument?
Original source
no?
rektbyfaith
10-13-2018, 01:55 PM #8Archived author: Skarn • Posted: 2018-10-13T13:55:10.633000+00:00
Original source
no?
Original source
ugh, that stuff stops making sense to me
rektbyfaith
10-13-2018, 01:55 PM #9Archived author: Skarn • Posted: 2018-10-13T13:55:29.145000+00:00
Original source
ugh, that stuff stops making sense to me
Original source
I'm saying it's safe to treat it as a void * so long as you don't dereference it
rektbyfaith
10-13-2018, 01:55 PM #10Archived author: Quantam • Posted: 2018-10-13T13:55:33.875000+00:00
Original source
I'm saying it's safe to treat it as a void * so long as you don't dereference it