[DiscordArchive] can we please first agree on one definition of what an `fp_6_9` is before we discuss optimizations?
[DiscordArchive] can we please first agree on one definition of what an `fp_6_9` is before we discuss optimizations?
Original source
can we please first agree on one definition of what an `fp_6_9` is before we discuss optimizations?
rektbyfaith
06-05-2018, 12:53 PM #1Archived author: schlumpf • Posted: 2018-06-05T12:53:27.110000+00:00
Original source
can we please first agree on one definition of what an `fp_6_9` is before we discuss optimizations?
Original source
Also, the check for sign is not redundant based on the underlying type.
rektbyfaith
06-05-2018, 12:53 PM #2Archived author: schlumpf • Posted: 2018-06-05T12:53:40.577000+00:00
Original source
Also, the check for sign is not redundant based on the underlying type.
Original source
well, according to wiki fp_6_9 is type of vector's component in M2Particle
rektbyfaith
06-05-2018, 12:55 PM #3Archived author: Deamon • Posted: 2018-06-05T12:55:18.931000+00:00
Original source
well, according to wiki fp_6_9 is type of vector's component in M2Particle
Original source
Yes, but I don't think we agree on how that is assembled in this discussion.
rektbyfaith
06-05-2018, 12:55 PM #4Archived author: schlumpf • Posted: 2018-06-05T12:55:47.940000+00:00
Original source
Yes, but I don't think we agree on how that is assembled in this discussion.
Original source
I.e. you guys claim wiki is wrong.
rektbyfaith
06-05-2018, 12:55 PM #5Archived author: schlumpf • Posted: 2018-06-05T12:55:56.503000+00:00
Original source
I.e. you guys claim wiki is wrong.
Original source
I do not claim the wiki is wrong. My complain is that blizz doesnt obey the common math for fixed point-float point conversion
rektbyfaith
06-05-2018, 12:57 PM #6Archived author: Deamon • Posted: 2018-06-05T12:57:00.185000+00:00
Original source
I do not claim the wiki is wrong. My complain is that blizz doesnt obey the common math for fixed point-float point conversion
Original source
is that even relevant what they do? is the question not just what the correct way to read their shit is?
rektbyfaith
06-05-2018, 12:58 PM #7Archived author: schlumpf • Posted: 2018-06-05T12:58:13.572000+00:00
Original source
is that even relevant what they do? is the question not just what the correct way to read their shit is?
Original source
"they do it weirdly" doesnt really help skarn write files
rektbyfaith
06-05-2018, 12:58 PM #8Archived author: schlumpf • Posted: 2018-06-05T12:58:24.868000+00:00
Original source
"they do it weirdly" doesnt really help skarn write files
Original source
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
rektbyfaith
06-05-2018, 12:58 PM #9Archived author: Deamon • Posted: 2018-06-05T12:58:48.094000+00:00
Original source
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Original source
tldr: blizzards are idiots. according to math, that field is encoded as... I can find the proper terms in English. So I would translate the russian terms as is:
https://i.imgur.com/qnMfFwA.png
So what they do is forward codehttps://imgur.com/qnMfFwA
rektbyfaith
06-05-2018, 01:04 PM #10Archived author: Deamon • Posted: 2018-06-05T13:04:47.588000+00:00
Original source
tldr: blizzards are idiots. according to math, that field is encoded as... I can find the proper terms in English. So I would translate the russian terms as is:
https://i.imgur.com/qnMfFwA.png
So what they do is forward codehttps://imgur.com/qnMfFwA
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)