[DiscordArchive] Oh... wait... what?
[DiscordArchive] Oh... wait... what?
Original source
Oh... wait... what?
rektbyfaith
06-04-2018, 06:24 PM #1Archived author: Quantam • Posted: 2018-06-04T18:24:15.461000+00:00
Original source
Oh... wait... what?
Original source
*double-checks something*
rektbyfaith
06-04-2018, 06:24 PM #2Archived author: Quantam • Posted: 2018-06-04T18:24:23.078000+00:00
Original source
*double-checks something*
Original source
Okay, good. I made a substitution error. That's so much better than the alternative
rektbyfaith
06-04-2018, 06:25 PM #3Archived author: Quantam • Posted: 2018-06-04T18:25:02.339000+00:00
Original source
Okay, good. I made a substitution error. That's so much better than the alternative
Original source
What I just said is still true
rektbyfaith
06-04-2018, 06:25 PM #4Archived author: Quantam • Posted: 2018-06-04T18:25:11.836000+00:00
Original source
What I just said is still true
Original source
Can you figure any reason at all why they do two multiplies for the int and dec parts? There's no reason for that at all
rektbyfaith
06-04-2018, 06:26 PM #5Archived author: Quantam • Posted: 2018-06-04T18:26:01.697000+00:00
Original source
Can you figure any reason at all why they do two multiplies for the int and dec parts? There's no reason for that at all
Original source
That is, right shift plus multiply
rektbyfaith
06-04-2018, 06:27 PM #6Archived author: Quantam • Posted: 2018-06-04T18:27:10.046000+00:00
Original source
That is, right shift plus multiply
Original source
v337 is sign, v340 is fractional part, (v336 & 0xFE00u) >> 9) is integer part
rektbyfaith
06-04-2018, 06:27 PM #7Archived author: Deamon • Posted: 2018-06-04T18:27:51.256000+00:00
Original source
v337 is sign, v340 is fractional part, (v336 & 0xFE00u) >> 9) is integer part
Original source
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
rektbyfaith
06-04-2018, 06:28 PM #8Archived author: Deamon • Posted: 2018-06-04T18:28:03.491000+00:00
Original source
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Original source
probably that's just a test code. I do not know if they replaced that crap with proper conversion in newer clients
rektbyfaith
06-04-2018, 06:28 PM #9Archived author: Deamon • Posted: 2018-06-04T18:28:55.673000+00:00
Original source
probably that's just a test code. I do not know if they replaced that crap with proper conversion in newer clients
Original source
((float)((v336 & 0xFE00u) >> 9) + v340) == ((float)v336 * 0.001953125)
rektbyfaith
06-04-2018, 06:29 PM #10Archived author: Quantam • Posted: 2018-06-04T18:29:03.231000+00:00
Original source
((float)((v336 & 0xFE00u) >> 9) + v340) == ((float)v336 * 0.001953125)
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)