[DiscordArchive] > i would change local tooltipFrame = CreateFrame("Frame", nil, treeFrame) to local tooltipFrame = C
[DiscordArchive] > i would change local tooltipFrame = CreateFrame("Frame", nil, treeFrame) to local tooltipFrame = C
Original source
keeps the cost of the timer on the client and not server
rektbyfaith
11-10-2023, 04:52 PM #41Archived author: tester • Posted: 2023-11-10T16:52:32.555000+00:00
Original source
keeps the cost of the timer on the client and not server
Original source
or run new thread with infinite loop
rektbyfaith
11-10-2023, 04:52 PM #42Archived author: Rymercyble • Posted: 2023-11-10T16:52:43.853000+00:00
Original source
or run new thread with infinite loop
Original source
could use an invisible periodic buff on playersand use that as the event to check them as well
rektbyfaith
11-10-2023, 04:53 PM #43Archived author: tester • Posted: 2023-11-10T16:53:17.965000+00:00
Original source
could use an invisible periodic buff on playersand use that as the event to check them as well
Original source
I'm not worried about the performance at this point but would just like to see this working
rektbyfaith
11-10-2023, 04:53 PM #44Archived author: Fred • Posted: 2023-11-10T16:53:26.684000+00:00
Original source
I'm not worried about the performance at this point but would just like to see this working
Original source
Yeah I figured this might be the way to go about it, but wanted to check if there is a way to avoid it
rektbyfaith
11-10-2023, 04:53 PM #45Archived author: Fred • Posted: 2023-11-10T16:53:39.622000+00:00
Original source
Yeah I figured this might be the way to go about it, but wanted to check if there is a way to avoid it
Original source
i like this
rektbyfaith
11-10-2023, 04:53 PM #46Archived author: Rymercyble • Posted: 2023-11-10T16:53:40.321000+00:00
Original source
i like this
Original source
this is simple it wont hurt performance but if u would have 100 simple things that would have performance impact
rektbyfaith
11-10-2023, 04:54 PM #47Archived author: Rymercyble • Posted: 2023-11-10T16:54:47.393000+00:00
Original source
this is simple it wont hurt performance but if u would have 100 simple things that would have performance impact
Original source
thats why "yes on update would work but avoid it even if its simple thing"
rektbyfaith
11-10-2023, 04:55 PM #48Archived author: Rymercyble • Posted: 2023-11-10T16:55:28.169000+00:00
Original source
thats why "yes on update would work but avoid it even if its simple thing"
Original source
I bet that the instructions for checking the dummy periodic updates is more expensive in terms of performance on the update loop than whatever I'm writing
rektbyfaith
11-10-2023, 04:56 PM #49Archived author: Fred • Posted: 2023-11-10T16:56:47.767000+00:00
Original source
I bet that the instructions for checking the dummy periodic updates is more expensive in terms of performance on the update loop than whatever I'm writing
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)