[DiscordArchive] Anyone know where these "Conditions" are contained? The maximum level for my server is 60 so it's ca
[DiscordArchive] Anyone know where these "Conditions" are contained? The maximum level for my server is 60 so it's ca
Original source
Anyone know where these "Conditions" are contained? The maximum level for my server is 60 so it's causing these errors and I want to remove them entirely. I looked in the database but I didn't find anything. Is this caused by SkillLineAbility.dbc?
![[Image: 2023-05-18.png?ex=690c0e77&is=690abcf7&h...192501a9b&]](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/415944535718494208/1108407811022540810/2023-05-18.png?ex=690c0e77&is=690abcf7&hm=960c174cb2b201b513404eaba4f43c09e9995e4abf649ed4377e648192501a9b&)
rektbyfaith
05-17-2023, 02:56 PM #1Archived author: GG EZ • Posted: 2023-05-17T14:56:55.423000+00:00
Original source
Anyone know where these "Conditions" are contained? The maximum level for my server is 60 so it's causing these errors and I want to remove them entirely. I looked in the database but I didn't find anything. Is this caused by SkillLineAbility.dbc?
Original source
it's the ones in the `conditions` world table. those seem to be custom entries because there is no skill 390
rektbyfaith
05-17-2023, 03:10 PM #2Archived author: <o> • Posted: 2023-05-17T15:10:06.249000+00:00
Original source
it's the ones in the `conditions` world table. those seem to be custom entries because there is no skill 390
Original source
can find those by `SELECT * FROM conditions WHERE ConditionTypeOrReference = 7 AND ConditionValue1 = 390;`
rektbyfaith
05-17-2023, 03:14 PM #3Archived author: <o> • Posted: 2023-05-17T15:14:45.406000+00:00
Original source
can find those by `SELECT * FROM conditions WHERE ConditionTypeOrReference = 7 AND ConditionValue1 = 390;`
Original source
Thanks, I checked that table and I don't see any that correspond with those values. I haven't edited those entries. The error only showed up once I edited the maximum player level to 60. I just tried that and there are no entries matching that. It must be coming from somewhere else.
rektbyfaith
05-17-2023, 03:18 PM #4Archived author: GG EZ • Posted: 2023-05-17T15:18:35.149000+00:00
Original source
Thanks, I checked that table and I don't see any that correspond with those values. I haven't edited those entries. The error only showed up once I edited the maximum player level to 60. I just tried that and there are no entries matching that. It must be coming from somewhere else.
Original source
only really happens in one place in ac source;
```
...
case CONDITION_SKILL:
{
SkillLineEntry const* pSkill = sSkillLineStore.LookupEntry(cond->ConditionValue1);
if (!pSkill)
{
LOG_ERROR("sql.sql", "Skill condition specifies non-existing skill ({}), skipped", cond->ConditionValue1);
return false;
}
if (cond->ConditionValue2 < 1 || cond->ConditionValue2 > sWorld->GetConfigMaxSkillValue())
{
LOG_ERROR("sql.sql", "Skill condition specifies invalid skill value ({}), skipped", cond->ConditionValue2);
return false;
}
...
}
...
```
rektbyfaith
05-17-2023, 03:19 PM #5Archived author: <o> • Posted: 2023-05-17T15:19:44.222000+00:00
Original source
only really happens in one place in ac source;
```
...
case CONDITION_SKILL:
{
SkillLineEntry const* pSkill = sSkillLineStore.LookupEntry(cond->ConditionValue1);
if (!pSkill)
{
LOG_ERROR("sql.sql", "Skill condition specifies non-existing skill ({}), skipped", cond->ConditionValue1);
return false;
}
if (cond->ConditionValue2 < 1 || cond->ConditionValue2 > sWorld->GetConfigMaxSkillValue())
{
LOG_ERROR("sql.sql", "Skill condition specifies invalid skill value ({}), skipped", cond->ConditionValue2);
return false;
}
...
}
...
```
Original source
~~ though i noticed your message is slightly different, but doubt it's functionally different~~ (nevermind just accidentally copied the wrong section)
rektbyfaith
05-17-2023, 03:20 PM #6Archived author: <o> • Posted: 2023-05-17T15:20:29.404000+00:00
Original source
~~ though i noticed your message is slightly different, but doubt it's functionally different~~ (nevermind just accidentally copied the wrong section)
Original source
so it's conditionvalue2 that's too high, not the id that's wrong
rektbyfaith
05-17-2023, 03:21 PM #7Archived author: <o> • Posted: 2023-05-17T15:21:40.431000+00:00
Original source
so it's conditionvalue2 that's too high, not the id that's wrong
Original source
I did find this online but idk
```case CONDITION_SKILL:
6441 {
6442 SkillLineEntry const *pSkill = sSkillLineStore.LookupEntry(value1);
6443 if (!pSkill)
6444 {
6445 sLog.outErrorDb("Skill condition specifies non-existing skill (%u), skipped", value1);
6446 return false;
6447 }
6448 if (value2 < 1 || value2 > sWorld.GetConfigMaxSkillValue() )
6449 {
6450 sLog.outErrorDb("Skill condition specifies invalid skill value (%u), skipped", value2);
6451 return false;
6452 }
6453 break;```
That's for TrinityCore but i'm using AC. I'm thinking it might be either a config issue or a dbc issue
rektbyfaith
05-17-2023, 03:21 PM #8Archived author: GG EZ • Posted: 2023-05-17T15:21:46.535000+00:00
Original source
I did find this online but idk
```case CONDITION_SKILL:
6441 {
6442 SkillLineEntry const *pSkill = sSkillLineStore.LookupEntry(value1);
6443 if (!pSkill)
6444 {
6445 sLog.outErrorDb("Skill condition specifies non-existing skill (%u), skipped", value1);
6446 return false;
6447 }
6448 if (value2 < 1 || value2 > sWorld.GetConfigMaxSkillValue() )
6449 {
6450 sLog.outErrorDb("Skill condition specifies invalid skill value (%u), skipped", value2);
6451 return false;
6452 }
6453 break;```
That's for TrinityCore but i'm using AC. I'm thinking it might be either a config issue or a dbc issue
Original source
390 is the skill points value, not the id. i just read the wrong code
rektbyfaith
05-17-2023, 03:22 PM #9Archived author: <o> • Posted: 2023-05-17T15:22:20.892000+00:00
Original source
390 is the skill points value, not the id. i just read the wrong code
Original source
so instead of ConditionValue1 you use ConditionValue2 instead
rektbyfaith
05-17-2023, 03:22 PM #10Archived author: <o> • Posted: 2023-05-17T15:22:36.996000+00:00
Original source
so instead of ConditionValue1 you use ConditionValue2 instead
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)