[DiscordArchive] that's good to know...I'll keep that in my toolbox...anyways...any comments about this?
[DiscordArchive] that's good to know...I'll keep that in my toolbox...anyways...any comments about this?
Original source
and that criteria for quest's status therefore should be based on its bitflag
rektbyfaith
03-07-2024, 11:18 AM #21Archived author: Kelpie • Posted: 2024-03-07T11:18:48.202000+00:00
Original source
and that criteria for quest's status therefore should be based on its bitflag
Original source
and not questid
rektbyfaith
03-07-2024, 11:18 AM #22Archived author: Kelpie • Posted: 2024-03-07T11:18:52.081000+00:00
Original source
and not questid
Original source
if not both
rektbyfaith
03-07-2024, 11:18 AM #23Archived author: Kelpie • Posted: 2024-03-07T11:18:57.015000+00:00
Original source
if not both
Original source
I'm simply saying this as someone who's been questchaining and have noticed that this seems to be the logic behind questv2
rektbyfaith
03-07-2024, 11:19 AM #24Archived author: Kelpie • Posted: 2024-03-07T11:19:27.224000+00:00
Original source
I'm simply saying this as someone who's been questchaining and have noticed that this seems to be the logic behind questv2
Original source
that they were trying to in some small manner futureproof their quest system
rektbyfaith
03-07-2024, 11:19 AM #25Archived author: Kelpie • Posted: 2024-03-07T11:19:42.961000+00:00
Original source
that they were trying to in some small manner futureproof their quest system
Original source
to allow a way to prevent explotation by repeating non-repeatable quests by changing the criteria
rektbyfaith
03-07-2024, 11:20 AM #26Archived author: Kelpie • Posted: 2024-03-07T11:20:01.237000+00:00
Original source
to allow a way to prevent explotation by repeating non-repeatable quests by changing the criteria
Original source
anyways, I'm just saying what I know, as I said in the beginning, sorry if I sound dumb by saying it
rektbyfaith
03-07-2024, 11:20 AM #27Archived author: Kelpie • Posted: 2024-03-07T11:20:50.961000+00:00
Original source
anyways, I'm just saying what I know, as I said in the beginning, sorry if I sound dumb by saying it
Original source
but I was wondering if it's worth considering that as part of the quest logic implementation
rektbyfaith
03-07-2024, 11:21 AM #28Archived author: Kelpie • Posted: 2024-03-07T11:21:16.909000+00:00
Original source
but I was wondering if it's worth considering that as part of the quest logic implementation
Original source
you know what if you use a positive value in ExclusiveGroup it already works that way? if quest X requires quests A, B and C to be completed and A, B and C all have the same ExclusiveGroup (> 0) then quest X is available to players who have completed A or B or C
rektbyfaith
03-07-2024, 11:22 AM #29Archived author: Tea • Posted: 2024-03-07T11:22:45.388000+00:00
Original source
you know what if you use a positive value in ExclusiveGroup it already works that way? if quest X requires quests A, B and C to be completed and A, B and C all have the same ExclusiveGroup (> 0) then quest X is available to players who have completed A or B or C
Original source
Yes, but that can only be done once
rektbyfaith
03-07-2024, 11:22 AM #30Archived author: Kelpie • Posted: 2024-03-07T11:22:57.999000+00:00
Original source
Yes, but that can only be done once